Read the full transcript of political scientist Prof. John Mearsheimer’s interview on Judging Freedom Podcast with Judge Napolitano on “A Brief History of Israel”, August 7, 2025.
The Origins of the Zionist Enterprise
JUDGE NAPOLITANO: Hi, everyone. Judge Andrew Napolitano here for Judging Freedom. Today is Thursday, August 7, 2025. Professor John Mearsheimer joins us now. Professor Mearsheimer, thank you very much for your time. I’m going to give the floor to you and you take as long as you want. Can you explain to us, please, as only you can, the origins of the state of Israel?
PROF. JOHN MEARSHEIMER: Yeah, I’d be glad to do that. And let me start by making some comments. Four sets of comments at about 60,000 feet, really general comments, and then drop down to 15,000 feet. Make a handful of comments that are more specific. But fill in the general comments that I’ll start with, please.
The first of my general comments is that when the Zionist enterprise got started around 1900, it’s important to understand that there were very few Jews, certainly very few Zionists in Palestine. You know, there was an adage at the time that this was “a land with no people for a people,” meaning the Jews who had no land. And of course, that was simply not true. There were a huge number of Palestinians living on that land. That’s the first point you want to keep in mind.
Second point is there’s no way you’re going to create a Jewish state on that land that’s filled with Palestinians without doing horrible things to the Palestinians without committing great crimes. And common sense just tells you there’s no way you could create a Jewish state in a piece of real estate that’s filled with Palestinians, again, without doing great crimes. And that includes stealing their land. And it’s very important to emphasize that the Zionists understood this from the get go. David Ben-Gurion, Vladimir Jabotinsky and so forth and so on. They all fully understood this.
Third point you want to keep in mind is that the Zionists from the get go paid very careful attention to demography. They were very concerned with how many Palestinians were in the land of Israel versus how many Jews there were. And 80% Jewish, 85% Jewish, that was acceptable. The ideal, of course, was to be 100% Jewish, but you didn’t want to have more than 20% Palestinian population. So demographics mattered.
The other thing that they paid enormous attention to was what was called transfer. We now call this ethnic cleansing. They talked about ethnic cleansing all the time. Not much in public, but in private they did because they fully understood that to create a Jewish state in a land filled with Palestinians, they were going to have to do transfer or ethnic cleansing.
Final general point that you want to keep in mind is that from the beginning, almost all of the Zionist leaders had very expansive goals concerning borders. They wanted to build a Greater Israel that included lots of territory. This was not stated publicly by most of the leaders, and the leaders had different views on what that Greater Israel should look like. But David Ben-Gurion, for example, wrote a book in Yiddish in 1918. He laid out his vision and it included what we call Green Line Israel. The Israel that was created after 1948. The occupied territories, that’s the West Bank and Gaza, parts of Syria, parts of Lebanon, parts of Jordan and the Sinai Peninsula.
So you get a sense for how ambitious the Zionists were from the get go. They wanted to create a Greater Israel. And that’s one of the principal reasons that Israel has no borders, no official borders. I believe it’s the only country on the planet that does not have official borders because they’re bent on creating a Greater Israel, whatever that might look like.
Jewish Migration to Palestine Before 1948
So that’s the sort of big picture. But let’s drop down to 15,000 feet and talk about the specifics. It’s important to understand that few Jews came out of Europe to Palestine before 1933. And of course, 1933 is when Hitler comes to power. And I think there are about 4 million Jews who leave Europe between 1880 and 1920, about 4 million Jews leave Europe and only 100,000 go to Palestine. Many, of course, come to the United States.
So you have this situation where there are not that many Jews in the land of Palestine. And then of course, you have World War II. And after World War II, lots of Jews leave Europe and go to Israel. But most Jews prefer to come west to come to places like Canada and the United States. So you have a situation in 1948 when the state is about to be created where 35% of the population is Jewish and 7% of the land is owned by Jews. So you just want to think about it. This is 1948, when the state is created, 35% of the population is Jewish in Palestine and the Jews own 7% of the land.
JUDGE NAPOLITANO: Let me just stop you here, Professor Mearsheimer, how was the state created? How do you take somebody else’s land and suddenly you become a recognized country?
The Creation of Israel and the UN Partition Plan
PROF. JOHN MEARSHEIMER: Okay, it’s important to understand that up until World War I, the Ottoman Empire, or what we today call Turkey, controlled Palestine. And then as a result of the collapse of the Ottoman Empire in World War I, Britain took over control of what was called Mandatory Palestine. So Britain was in control after World War II when there was huge resistance around the world to colonial empires, that is, there was huge resistance to the British Empire.
The British were up to their eyeballs in alligators trying to deal with resistance in places like India and in places like Palestine.
The Israelis, then the Zionists, wanted independence from Britain. The British reached the point where they were just fed up. So on November 29, 1947, the UN, with the British in the driver’s seat, pushed hard to create two states in Palestine, a Jewish state and a Palestinian state. That’s November 29, 1947. And of course, Israel is created in May of 1948, probably about six months later.
So that’s how Israel was created. It was created by the United Nations, and behind that was mainly the British, but also the United States went along with it. That’s how it was created. Now, what you want to understand is that the map that the UN drew was not advantageous to Israel at all. First of all, they ended up with a very small amount of territory inside Palestine. And furthermore, they ended up with a population distribution that was about 55% Jewish and 35% Palestinian. Okay? And this was not something that the Zionists liked at all, for obvious reasons.
So in 1948, before Israel gets its independence, a war breaks out between the Palestinians and the Zionists as the British are leaving, and the Zionists take more territory than they were given in the UN plan, and they expel a huge number, probably about 700,000, maybe 750,000 Palestinians. This is the infamous Nakba.
JUDGE NAPOLITANO: How did they expel them? They must have used violence. They didn’t compensate them for their land, did they?
The Nakba and Ethnic Cleansing
PROF. JOHN MEARSHEIMER: They did use violence. And the fact is that many of the Palestinians left without putting up much resistance. And it was reasonably easy for the Zionists and then later the Israelis after May 1948 to drive the Palestinians out. And the end result is that you get a state in 1948 which we call Green Line Israel. This is the Israel created by the 1948 war. That’s bigger than the Israel that was allotted to the Jews in the UN plan. And furthermore, after all the ethnic cleansing is about 80% Jewish and 20% Palestinian. Okay? So that’s the first big event.
The second big event, which is of course, of enormous importance, is the 1967 war, the famous Six Day War. In the Six Day War, the Israelis conquer the West Bank and Gaza. These are the occupied territories. I might add, parenthetically, that they also capture the Golan Heights. In the process of capturing the West Bank and capturing Gaza, they drive 200,000 more Palestinians mainly out of the West Bank and into Jordan. So this is the second big ethnic cleansing.
The first one was the Nakba in 1948, where you drive out about 700, 750,000 Palestinians, and then in 1967, you drive out another 200,000 Palestinians and 80,000 Syrians off the Golan Heights, as I said.
The Demographic Problem and October 7th
Now, the problem that the Israelis face once they conquer all this territory is that the number of Palestinians and the number of Israeli Jews in Greater Israel. Greater Israel is the Israel of 1948, plus those two occupied territories. In these three pieces of real estate, you have roughly 7.3 million Jews and 7.33 million Palestinians. And I told you how much attention the Israelis paid to demographics, and at worst, they would accept 80-20. They really wanted 100-0. But here you have basically 50-50. And the demographic trends tell you that over time the Palestinians will outnumber the Israeli Jews. So this is a huge problem.
Then you have October 7th, and you want to think about October 7th in the context of the problem I just described. What the Israelis want to do, right, is they want to cleanse the Palestinians. They want to get the ratio down to at least 80-20. It’s 50-50, 7.3 versus 7.3.
JUDGE NAPOLITANO: This is not 50-50 now, is it?
PROF. JOHN MEARSHEIMER: It’s probably still close to 50-50. I mean, it’s hard to tell exactly how many Palestinians have been killed. But let’s assume that 100,000 Palestinians have been killed, not the 60,000 number that’s frequently used. That would drive the number from 7.3 down to 7.2. And one could argue that a significant number of Israelis have left the country and are not coming back. I see you have somewhere in the range of 50-50. But even if it’s 45% Palestinian and 55% Jewish, this is unacceptable to the Israelis, especially when you think about projected birth rates.
So you see, what October 7th does for the Israelis is present an opportunity for the third big ethnic cleansing. And again, I want to emphasize that ethnic cleansing, or what the early Zionists call transfer, has been in their minds from the beginning, because there’s no way you create a reasonably homogeneous Jewish state in a sea of Palestinians without ethnically cleansing them, right?
So anyway, what’s going on in Gaza is ethnic cleansing. The other thing that you see happening, which doesn’t get that much attention today, but we don’t want to lose sight of, and this is my final point, is that the Israelis have occupied southern Lebanon and they have occupied southern Syria. And I do not believe they have any intention of leaving because they are interested in creating a Greater Israel and that goes beyond Green Line Israel. That’s the Israel of 1948 plus Gaza, plus the West Bank.
So this is not only an opportunity, the events after October 7th are not only an opportunity to ethnically cleanse, it’s an opportunity to expand the borders of Israel or to create Lebensraum.
The Fate of the Palestinian State
JUDGE NAPOLITANO: Let’s go back to 1948 when the state of Israel was created. Was the state of Palestine recognized by the UN?
PROF. JOHN MEARSHEIMER: Sure. It was a two-state solution.
JUDGE NAPOLITANO: And what became of the state of Palestine?
PROF. JOHN MEARSHEIMER: Well, what became of the state of Palestine is that the Jordanians basically took control of the West Bank and the Egyptians took control of the Gaza Strip. So it was sort of a de facto state, but in de jure it was the Jordanians and the Egyptians who were in charge.
JUDGE NAPOLITANO: But there still was some legal mechanism emanating from the UN which was very new in 1948, which characterized Palestine as a sovereign state recognized by the only international body existing at the time.
PROF. JOHN MEARSHEIMER: I’m not sure about that. I’d have to go back and look, to be honest, exactly what the language was.
Israeli Accountability and the Power of the Lobby
JUDGE NAPOLITANO: Okay, okay. You were asked in one of the famous lectures that you gave a few years ago, not that long ago. I think it was before or after October 7th, if the Israelis can ever be held accountable for their aberrant behavior. Here’s how you answered it. Cut number 21.
VIDEO CLIP BEGINS:
PROF. JOHN MEARSHEIMER: If I went to the Middle East and visited Israel and I was killed, somebody shot me there, do you think there’d be any accountability? Seriously, if any of you went to the Middle East and were killed, do you think there’d be accountability? There wouldn’t be. This is how outrageous this situation is. Just think about the Liberty. Think about Rachel Corrie. Think about this Turkish American who was just killed in the flotilla. There’s no accountability. Israelis can do almost anything and get away with it. So the idea that opacity matters, I don’t think so. The lobby basically leads. It can finesse any issue. They’ve never seen an issue that they can’t finesse.
VIDEO CLIP ENDS:
JUDGE NAPOLITANO: Why is it that the Israelis can get away with anything?
PROF. JOHN MEARSHEIMER: Because of the power of the lobby in the United States. It’s impossible, or has been up to now, impossible for any American president to really go after the Israelis and punish anybody for killing Americans because they pay a significant political price.
JUDGE NAPOLITANO: And does the lobby have this kind of power outside of the United States? Does it have power in France, does it have power in Great Britain? Does it have power in Germany? Does it have power in Spain or Portugal or Italy?
PROF. JOHN MEARSHEIMER: I’d say yes to all those countries. And you definitely want to add Australia and Canada as well. You’d be shocked at how much power the lobby has in Australia and Canada. And if you have any doubts or any of the viewers have any doubts about the power of the lobby in Britain, just take a look at what happened to Jeremy Corbyn. Jeremy Corbyn looked like he might be Prime Minister. He’s very critical of Israel and wanted Britain to treat Israel like a normal country. And the lobby basically destroyed his political career.
The Power of the Israeli Lobby
JUDGE NAPOLITANO: How can this change?
PROF. JOHN MEARSHEIMER: I’m not sure. I don’t have a good answer to that question at this point in time. The lobby is just so powerful. I mean, most people are reluctant to say that because you get accused of being an anti-Semite.
JUDGE NAPOLITANO: Right, right. Well, you’ve been accused of so many things and you’re so intellectually honest and so courageous. I’m sure it bounces off your back.
I mean, just a few hours ago, Prime Minister Netanyahu announced his intention, I don’t know if his so called Security Council or Security Cabinet has voted on this yet, to use the IDF to occupy Gaza. This notwithstanding the persistent opposition of the head of the IDF, the three star general that commands it, and notwithstanding what is probably the opposition of most Israelis. Can he get away with this militarily or is this a disaster that he’s walking into?
Netanyahu’s Gaza Strategy
PROF. JOHN MEARSHEIMER: Well, I think that if the cabinet backs him up, which I would assume will happen, he can do it, he can execute it. The question you have to ask yourself is do you think that he’s going to succeed? I mean, what he’s claiming he can do is finish off Hamas once and for all and pacify Gaza. I would argue, by the way, that his real goal is to finish the ethnic cleansing.
But leaving that aside for the moment, do you believe that he can finish off Hamas? And you want to understand that on May 16, they launched, they, meaning the Israelis, launched this huge military operation in Gaza called Gideon’s Chariots. And it just ended earlier this month, earlier in August. And it was a failure by all accounts. It was designed to do with what this new operation is designed to do, i.e. finish off Hamas. And they failed to do that.
And this is why the chief of staff of the IDF and this general was hand picked recently by Netanyahu, is adamantly opposed to another offensive. It’s why all sorts of security officials ex Security officials who’ve occupied the highest positions inside the Israeli national security establishment are adamantly opposed to this operation. So there is huge opposition. That opposition is predicated on the assumption that it’s going to fail and lots of Israelis are going to get killed, lots of Palestinians are going to get killed, and lots of Israel’s reputation, which is already in the toilet bowl, is going to be even worse off as a result of this operation. So they’re opposed. But can Netanyahu do it? If he wants and he gets permission from the Cabinet, the answer is yes.
Trump’s Relationship with Netanyahu
JUDGE NAPOLITANO: Does he need permission from Donald Trump or does he give permission to Trump? Which way does permission flow between Netanyahu and Trump?
PROF. JOHN MEARSHEIMER: You’re assuming he would ask permission. Why would he ask permission? He doesn’t need Donald Trump’s permission. He does what he wants. And he understands full well that Donald Trump will back him.
By the way, if you look at leaders all around the world, and this includes Western leaders, even in places like Germany, all of these leaders are very skittish about what is happening in Gaza, and they are putting pressure on the Israelis to put an end to this offensive in Gaza. And this includes the Chancellor in Germany. Right. But there is no evidence that President Trump is bothered at all by what is happening in Gaza, and there is no evidence that he is putting any pressure on Israel. So, again, why would Prime Minister Netanyahu worry about what Donald Trump thinks about another offensive in Gaza when we’ve heard, or he’s heard hardly a peep from Trump in the past.
JUDGE NAPOLITANO: Trump was asked, would you support Israel reoccupying all of Gaza? And his answer, of course, is all over the place. But the bottom line is he doesn’t know. Chris, cut number five.
VIDEO CLIP BEGINS:
UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: Would you support Israel reoccupying all of Gaza, as has been suggested by some Israeli?
DONALD TRUMP: Well, I don’t know what the suggestion is. I know that we are, we are there now trying to get people fed. As you know, $60 million was given by the United States fairly recently to supply food, and a lot of, a lot of food, frankly, for the people of Gaza that are obviously not doing too well with the food. And I know Israel is going to help us with that in terms of distribution and also money. We also have. The Arab states are going to help us with that in terms of the money and possibly distribution. So that’s what I’m focused on. As far the rest of it, I really, I really can’t say. That’s going to be pretty much up to Israel. Yeah, please catch up to Israel.
VIDEO CLIP ENDS:
JUDGE NAPOLITANO: He doesn’t know what he’s talking about with the food. The organization he’s talking about is run by Mossad. According to Max Blumenthal and Aaron Mate, they have reduced 400 food distribution centers to three or four. That’s what the United States is paying for. And he wants to be thanked. He wants to be thanked for that.
PROF. JOHN MEARSHEIMER: But just let me say his answer mirror images what I said. He said it’s up to Israel.
JUDGE NAPOLITANO: Yes.
PROF. JOHN MEARSHEIMER: Whether or not they occupy Gaza. And that’s exactly what you’d expect from him. And of course, he’s focusing on the food situation because that’s what has people all around the world, including West European leaders, up in arms. And again, he is the only leader who’s not up in arms. He’s doing a bit to sort of ameliorate the problem because he doesn’t like the criticism that’s being directed at him.
JUDGE NAPOLITANO: Here he is. Yesterday, you said many times that you want to stop wars in the Middle East. Watch his answer cut number 14.
VIDEO CLIP BEGINS:
UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: You said many times that you want to stop wars in the Middle East. Now, Prime Minister Netanyahu is contemplating reoccupying Gaza entirely. Does he define you, sir, or are you giving him a green light?
DONALD TRUMP: Well, we have stopped wars in the Middle east by stopping Iran from having a nuclear weapon. And they are, they’re, you know, they can say they’re going to start all over again, but that’s a very dangerous thing for them to do because we’ll be back as soon as they start, we’ll be back.
VIDEO CLIP ENDS:
American Military Involvement in Gaza
JUDGE NAPOLITANO: Your colleague Professor Postol at MIT says they have a nuclear weapon already. That Trump doesn’t know what he’s talking about. Of course, he dodged the question whether or not he supports Israel occupying Gaza. Suppose Netanyahu requests American troops on the ground in Gaza not to help feed the Palestinians, but to help kill them. What will Trump do?
PROF. JOHN MEARSHEIMER: I think he would resist. I find it hard to imagine him doing that, and I actually find it hard to imagine Netanyahu asking Trump to do that. I would imagine that Netanyahu fears that the United States will get deeply involved in Gaza, especially in terms of feeding the local population. And that’ll make it much more difficult for Netanyahu then to cleanse Gaza or to control it the way he would like.
I mean, what they want to do, what the Israelis want to do now, is that they want to create concentration camps in Gaza. Gaza, as you know, before October 7th was one giant concentration camp, but they’re now occupying huge chunks of Gaza, well over 50% of the territory. And what they want to do is that they want to concentrate the Gazan population in camps, in concentration camps.
I mean, really what they wanted to do, at least what Netanyahu wanted to do was he wanted to put them in death camps. You understand, in Europe during the Holocaust, there was a difference between concentration camps and death camps. Death camps where we took Jews and others to be murdered outright, concentration camps. A lot of death certainly took place in those concentration camps, but they were different than death camps.
And what the Israelis initially wanted to do was turn those camps in Gaza into death camps. They wanted to starve the Palestinians to death. Right, or kill them from the air. And that’s what they were doing. That’s why the world is up in arms, because all of those people were dying and were on the verge of a famine. So you can’t do that anymore. No more death camps. So what you got to do is you go to concentration camps and what you do is you put people in small pieces of territory and you give them enough food and water and medicine to survive, but they live like animals inside these concentration camps.
International Pressure and Israeli Policy
JUDGE NAPOLITANO: Why can there be no more death camps? What would stop, who would stop Netanyahu?
PROF. JOHN MEARSHEIMER: I think that world opinion turned so completely on Israel in recent weeks that the Israelis have been forced to back off. The Israelis and most of their supporters in the United States have been forced to back off. And they’re now talking about allowing food and medicine and water into Gaza, but that’s it. They’re not talking about rebuilding Gaza. They’re not talking about Palestinian self determination. Because again, you have to understand that the goal here is to ethnically cleanse Gaza.
And by the way, as many of your guests have pointed out on this show, ethically cleansing Gaza enjoys widespread support inside of Israel. We in the west like to portray Netanyahu as an outlier. And the argument is if you only get rid of Netanyahu and you replace him with another more reasonable leader, all these problems will go away. This is ridiculous. The political center of gravity in Israel is far to the right. It’s extremely hostile to the Palestinians.
And the reason that Benjamin Netanyahu is in power and has survived for so long, even though he was in the driver’s seat on October 7, is because his thinking about how to deal with the Palestinians is reflected in the larger population. So anyway, you’ll have little resistance inside Israel to putting these people in concentration camps. And I would argue that you’d have little resistance if these concentration camps turned into death camps. But you would have major league resistance outside of Israel. And that’s what’s happened over the past couple weeks. And that’s why the Israelis have backed off somewhat.
American Political Support for Israel
JUDGE NAPOLITANO: Here is the show you how obsequious the United States is. Here’s the person second in line to the presidency of the United States right after the vice president in Israel yesterday. Cut number 19.
VIDEO CLIP BEGINS:
UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: Israeli government approved you to bring your five pets. So what biblical town in the west bank did Mike Johnson visit? Well, let’s take a look. Who is that American tourist in the blue shirt and the khakis there? Well, there he is. Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson. Where is Mike Johnson? Where is that crowd? Shiloh. Checking out the heifers.
JUDGE NAPOLITANO: Gotta look at the heifers.
UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: Gotta check out. When he said your pets, by the way, when he said they allowed you to bring your pets, there is an export ban on cattle from the United States to Israel. So what they did is they said they’re pets. They classified them as pets. They flew them on a Boeing 777. The speaker of the House of Representatives intimately involved in this red heifer prophecy. Hi, I’m Mike Johnson.
MIKE JOHNSON: I’m the speaker of the House of Representatives in the United States Congress. We are so blessed to be here at ancient Shiloh. Shiloh, as they say here. We had a number of members of Congress here to pray. We pray for our nation and for peace in Jerusalem, peace for Israel, and we’re so grateful to be joined by all of our friends. Thank you.
VIDEO CLIP ENDS:
JUDGE NAPOLITANO: The reference to the heifers was the illegal importation of five heifers from Texas to Shiloh to be ritually slaughtered in furtherance of what Mike Johnson believes is some prophecy from the Old Testament. You can’t make this stuff up.
PROF. JOHN MEARSHEIMER: It’s hard to believe where we are as a country. It’s hard to feel good as an American these days.
Conclusion
JUDGE NAPOLITANO: I hope that JD Vance stays very healthy and Mike Johnson is nowhere near the seat of power. Of course, as the speaker of the House of Representatives, he already has enormous power, but this is the mentality that we’re dealing with.
Professor Mearsheimer, thank you very much for all of this. I have long wanted to put on tape your understanding of the origins of Israel. And now we have it for everyone to see. It’s always a pleasure. I know you did a lot of the talking, but you’re so good at it. There’s nobody better. And it’s deeply appreciated. We look forward to seeing you again next week.
PROF. JOHN MEARSHEIMER: Likewise. Have a good weekend, Judge.
JUDGE NAPOLITANO: Thank you. You as well. Coming up at 4 o’clock today on all of this and on Ukraine and on President Trump meeting with President Putin and on the condition imposed on that meeting at the last minute by the White House that Vladimir Zelensky be there. Who better to talk about all of this than Colonel Douglas McGregor? Judge Napolitano, for judging Freedom.
Related Posts