Skip to content

Transcript: Philip K. Dick Speech at Metz, France 1977

Editor’s Note: Delivered at the Metz Sci-Fi Festival in 1977, this legendary speech by visionary author Philip K. Dick challenges the very nature of our reality. Dick introduces the mind-bending concept of “orthogonal time,” proposing that we do not just move linearly from past to future, but laterally across overlapping, parallel universes. Drawing from his own intense personal experiences and the themes of his famous novels, he ultimately argues that we are living in a computer-programmed simulation where variables are constantly being altered by a divine programmer.

TRANSCRIPT:

Introduction and Apology for a Shortened Speech

PHILIP K. DICK: May I tell you how much I appreciate your asking me to share some of my ideas with you. The title of my address is, “If you find this world bad, you should see some of the others.”

I would like to confess that I have been asked to cut about two-thirds of my speech out and deliver as short a speech as possible. Upon examining my speech, I find that it is very easy to remove two-thirds without doing any injury to it. I even considered cutting three-thirds out of it, but there was some trouble, so I abandoned that idea.

The Topic: Orthogonal Time

The subject of this speech is a topic which has been discovered recently and which may not exist at all. I may be talking about something that does not exist, therefore I am free to say everything or nothing. I can hardly make an error if there is no such thing as orthogonal time.

Orthogonal or right-angle time is the topic of my speech. We are accustomed to supposing that all change takes place along the linear time axis from past to present to future. The present is an accrual of the past and is different from it. The future will accrue from the present on and be different yet.

That an orthogonal or right-angle time axis could exist, a lateral domain in which change takes place, processes occurring sideways in reality, so to speak, this is almost impossible to imagine. How would we perceive such lateral changes? What would we experience? What clues, if we are trying to test out this bizarre theory, should we be on the alert for? In other words, how can change take place outside of linear time at all, in any sense, through any degree?

A Metaphor: The Rich Patron and His Paintings

Let me present you with a metaphor. Let us say that there exists this very rich patron of the arts. Every day on the wall of his living room above his fireplace, his servants hang a new picture, each day a different masterpiece, day after day, month after month, each day the used one is removed and replaced by a different and new one. I shall call this process change along the linear axis.

But now let us suppose the servants temporarily running out of new replacement pictures. What shall they do in the meantime? They can’t just leave the present one hanging. Their employer has decreed that perpetual replacement, that is to say, changing the pictures, is to take place. So they neither allow the current one to remain, nor do they replace it with a new one.

Instead they do a very clever thing. When their employer is not looking, the servants cunningly alter the picture already on the wall. They paint out a tree here, they paint in a little girl there, they add this, they obliterate that. They make the same painting different, and in a sense new, but as I’m sure you can see, not new in the sense of replacing it.

The Employer’s Perceptual Confusion

The employer enters his living room after dinner, sees himself facing the fireplace, and contemplates what should be, according to his expectations, a new picture. What does he see? It certainly isn’t what he saw previously, but also it isn’t somehow, and here we must become very sympathetic with this perhaps somewhat stupid man, because we can virtually see his brain circuits striving to understand.

His brain circuits are saying, “Yes, it is a new picture, it is not the same one as yesterday, but also it is the same one, I think. I feel on a very deep intuitive basis, I feel that somehow I’ve seen it before. I seem to remember a tree though, and there is no tree.”

Now perhaps if we extrapolate from this man’s perceptual-mentational confusion to the theoretical point I was making about lateral change, you can get a better idea of what I mean. I mean perhaps you can, to at least a degree, see that although what I’m talking about may not exist, my concept may be fictional, it could exist, it is not intellectually self-contradictory.

The Lateral Axis and the Kingdom of God

Contemplating this possibility of a lateral arrangement of worlds, a plurality of overlapping earths along whose linking axis a person can somehow move, can travel in a mysterious way from worst to fair to good to excellent, contemplating this in theological terms, perhaps we could say that herewith we suddenly decipher the elliptical utterances which Christ expressed regarding the Kingdom of God, specifically where it is located.

He seems to have given contradictory and puzzling answers, but suppose, just suppose for an instant, that the cause of the perplexity lay not in any desire on his part to baffle or to hide, but in the inadequacy of the question. “My kingdom is not of this world,” he is reported to have said. “The kingdom is within you,” or possibly “it is among you.”

I put before you now the notion which I personally find exciting, that he may have had in mind that which I speak of as the lateral axis of overlapping realms which contain among them a spectrum of aspects ranging from the unspeakably malignant to the beautiful. And Christ was saying over and over again that there really are many objective realms, somehow related and somehow bridgeable by living, not dead men, and that the most wondrous of these worlds was a just kingdom in which either he himself or God himself or both of them ruled.

And he did not merely speak of a variety of ways of subjectively viewing one world.