Skip to content
Home » How AI Can Heal Healthcare: Edmund Jackson (Transcript)

How AI Can Heal Healthcare: Edmund Jackson (Transcript)

Read the full transcript of Dr Edmund Jackson’s talk titled “How AI Can Heal Healthcare” at TEDxNashville 2024 conference.

Listen to the audio version here:

TRANSCRIPT:

A Pivotal Encounter

DR EDMUND JACKSON: 10 years ago, I found myself in the office of a singular individual, Dr. John Perlin. At the time, he was the chief medical officer for a hospital company called HCA Healthcare, where I was applying for a job as a data scientist.

And I said to him, “Dr. Perlin, what is it that you’d have me, a data guy, do for you?” And he proceeded to tell me about a disease called sepsis. It’s a systemic bloodstream infection that if identified early, can be very readily treated with about 25 cents worth of antibiotics and fluid.

And if it goes unrecognized, spreads through the body, leading to systemic inflammation, organ failure, and all too frequently, death. And Dr. Perlin proceeded to tell me at length about the etiology, biochemistry, pharmacology of this disease, and I understood none of what he was telling me.

And I said, “John, I really don’t understand. I’m not that kind of doctor. I’m a doctor of numbers.” And he said, “I understand. I tell you all this to convince you that as clinicians, we’ve tried everything we can do in the fight against sepsis, and we are still losing. Our care simply does not arrive in time to be relevant.

We need an early warning of sepsis. We believe it’s in the data, and that you and your fellow data scientists can find it.” What Dr. Perlin didn’t know was that 20 years prior to that conversation, sepsis had killed my father. He was 58, and I was a teenager.

So I found myself in a room opposite a man telling me that for want of 25 cents worth of drugs, my dad might still be alive, and moreover, that I could play a part in preventing other families going through what I did and my family did. Well, I entered that office seeking a job, and I left carrying a mission.

The Paradox of Modern Healthcare

But what little did I know? You see, healthcare itself is sick. Something is very, very wrong in healthcare. You see, we’ve never had more well-educated, more dedicated, more specialized physicians. We’ve never had instruments and labs and diagnostic tools that are more precise. We’ve never had therapies and drugs that are more potent and can render what was once a death sentence as a mere inconvenience or a meme.

And yet despite all of this, healthcare is failing. On any measure that we care about, be it clinical quality, patient experience, and most of all, the four and a half trillion dollar bill that healthcare levies on America every year, things are getting worse.

But why? People tell me, “Edmund, it’s complicated.” No. It’s complexity.

ALSO READ:  What if There's Nothing Wrong With You: Susan Henkels (Full Transcript)

In healthcare, we have never slain the demon of complexity. You see, in other parts of the economy, like technology or consumer goods, there are patterns and modes of thought, like standardization, automation, playbooks, that enable us to simplify what we’re doing by doing the same thing over and over again.

While Apple Watch is a great example of this, a tremendously complicated device, and yet one of millions of identical devices, that standardization enables Apple to make a device at low cost and high quality.

But in healthcare, we are the product, and there’s no such thing as a standard human. Heck, I don’t even know what size my shoe is half the time. And so everything we’ve learned and applied in the rest of the economy about simplification doesn’t work in healthcare.

And the cruel irony is that those new specializations of physicians, those new instruments, those new therapies, while individually good, combine to increase complexity and so make things worse. It’s a pure torture. What we need is a new mode of thought to simplify. We need new technology, and that technology is AI.

The Evolution of AI

What is it? An AI is simply a machine that thinks like a human, but at scale. The first generation of AIs were AIs that could do logic, as you and I do. There were enormous branches, trees of if-then-else statements, inductive-abductive logic, and they worked, but they were incredibly intricate, expensive to produce, and even more expensive to maintain.

And so they fell into disuse. They were the first and the second AI boom-bust cycle. The second generation of AIs were AIs that can do mathematics and see patterns, as we do. To share with data, the AI, through machine learning, can infer a model which makes predictions about the future. You know, we used to joke about the weatherman and how useless and unreliable they were.

And we don’t anymore, because aided by AI, they’re really damn good.

So, yeah, the third and current generation of AIs are machines that understand language, as we do. Kat just gave great examples of that. These are machines that can read and write, listen and speak in all of our human languages, but at scale.

And as a society, we haven’t yet figured out exactly what we’re going to do with all of this, but we know it’s big. One of the leading proponents is a company called OpenAI. It’s valued at $80 billion on revenues of one and losses of five billion.

And what is it? It’s a text box.

But it’s a text box, critically, that contains the whole internet. You see, OpenAI has a machine that has read the internet and will answer all of your questions about it. And that a text box containing the internet should be worth an unfathomable sum should come as no surprise, because that is precisely exactly what Google was for the last generation of AIs.

ALSO READ:  Think Faster, Focus Better and Remember More: Dr. Michael Merzenich (Transcript)

Moreover, it’s a pattern of thought. OpenAI did not seek to simplify the internet. They wrapped it in a very simple surface, that text box.