In a conversation meant to spark debate, entrepreneur Andrew Forrest and head of TED Chris Anderson discuss an ambitious plan to get the world’s biggest companies to fund an environmental revolution — and transition industry towards getting all of its plastic from recycled materials, not from fossil fuels.
CHRIS ANDERSON: So, you’ve been obsessed with this problem for the last few years. What is the problem, in your own words?
ANDREW FORREST: Plastic. Simple as that. Our inability to use it for the tremendous energetic commodity that it is, and just throw it away.
CHRIS ANDERSON: And so we see waste everywhere. At its extreme, it looks a bit like this. I mean, where was this picture taken?
ANDREW FORREST: That’s in the Philippines, and you know, there’s a lot of rivers, ladies and gentlemen, which look exactly like that. And that’s the Philippines. So it’s all over Southeast Asia.
CHRIS ANDERSON: So plastic is thrown into the rivers, and from there, of course, it ends up in the ocean. I mean, we obviously see it on the beaches, but that’s not even your main concern. It’s what’s actually happening to it in the oceans. Talk about that.
ANDREW FORREST: OK, so look. Thank you, Chris. About four years ago, I thought I’d do something really barking crazy, and I committed to do a PhD in marine ecology. And the scary part about that was, sure, I learned a lot about marine life, but it taught me more about marine death and the extreme mass ecological fatality of fish, of marine life, marine mammals, very close biology to us, which are dying in the millions if not trillions that we can’t count at the hands of plastic.
CHRIS ANDERSON: But people think of plastic as ugly but stable. Right? You throw something in the ocean, “Hey, it’ll just sit there forever. Can’t do any damage, right?”
ANDREW FORREST: See, Chris, it’s an incredible substance designed for the economy. It is the worst substance possible for the environment. The worst thing about plastics, as soon as it hits the environment, is that it fragments. It never stops being plastic. It breaks down smaller and smaller and smaller.
And the breaking science on this, Chris, which we’ve known in marine ecology for a few years now, but it’s going to hit humans. We are aware now that nanoplastic, the very, very small particles of plastic, carrying their negative charge, can go straight through the pores of your skin. That’s not the bad news.
The bad news is that it goes straight through the blood-brain barrier, that protective coating which is there to protect your brain. Your brain’s a little amorphous, wet mass full of little electrical charges. You put a negative particle into that, particularly a negative particle which can carry pathogens — so you have a negative charge, it attracts positive-charge elements, like pathogens, toxins, mercury, lead.
That’s the breaking science we’re going to see in the next 12 months.
CHRIS ANDERSON: So already I think you told me that there’s like 600 plastic bags or so for every fish that size in the ocean, something like that. And they’re breaking down, and there’s going to be ever more of them. And we haven’t even seen the start of the consequences of that.
ANDREW FORREST: No, we really haven’t. The Ellen MacArthur Foundation, they’re a bunch of good scientists, we’ve been working with them for a while. I’ve completely verified their work. They say there will be one ton of plastic, Chris, for every three tons of fish by, not 2050 — and I really get impatient with people who talk about 2050 — by 2025. That’s around the corner. That’s just the here and now.
You don’t need one ton of plastic to completely wipe out marine life. Less than that is going to do a fine job at it. So we have to end it straightaway. We’ve got no time.