Skip to content
Home » Chemistry For Your Sex-Starved Marriage: Jessica Gold (Transcript)

Chemistry For Your Sex-Starved Marriage: Jessica Gold (Transcript)

Here is the full transcript of Jessica Gold’s talk titled “Chemistry For Your Sex-Starved Marriage” at TEDxGrandviewHeights conference.

Jessica Gold’s talk, “Chemistry For Your Sex-Starved Marriage,” offers a compelling and innovative approach to revitalizing intimacy in relationships. Drawing from her unique background as a PhD organic chemist turned sex and relationship coach, Gold delves into the essential principles of emotional safety and spark, which she identifies as crucial for deepening connection and enhancing sexual fulfillment.

She challenges the conventional wisdom of “happy wife, happy life,” arguing that true relationship satisfaction comes from authenticity and mutual respect rather than sacrificing one’s needs for the sake of peace. By sharing her personal journey of transformation—from a career in science to exploring the complexities of human bonding—Gold illustrates the power of applying scientific curiosity to our personal lives. She provides practical strategies for couples to rekindle their intimacy, emphasizing the importance of communication, emotional vulnerability, and playful interaction.

Gold’s talk is a call to action for individuals and couples to approach their relationships with the same dedication and openness to learning that they would apply to any important endeavor in life. Ultimately, “Chemistry For Your Sex-Starved Marriage” is a testament to the transformative potential of viewing love and intimacy through the lens of emotional and physical chemistry.

Listen to the audio version here:

TRANSCRIPT:

Understanding Relationship Dynamics

If I do everything she wants to please her and keep her happy, then I’ll have the intimacy and sex that I want. I’ll have a good marriage and a happy life. This is the refrain that I hear over and over from the men who come to work with me in my practice. After all, “happy wife, happy life,” right? Wrong.

Of course, the intention behind this saying is good. Who doesn’t want their partner to be happy? But we misunderstand how to execute it. Because when you abandon yourself in order to get love, it’s an unspoken transaction that creates resentment, not attraction. So what do you do instead? Because today, as many as one in seven adults are in marriages with little to no sex. Now for some couples, this isn’t a problem.

But for 100% of the men that come to work with me, it’s definitely a problem. And what I propose is bonding. You see, I’ve been studying bonding for my entire life. First, molecular bonding as a PhD organic chemist, and now human bonding as a sex and relationship coach.

The Paradox of Intimacy and Attraction

And I’ve noticed that there are two principles that we just never get taught, but they are essential for more intimacy, more trust, happiness, and yes, great sex. Who here wants that? “Woo!” You see, these two principles actually represent a paradox at the heart of modern relating, a juicy paradox that when we learn to dance with it skillfully, it’s like magic.

The first principle is creating a foundation of emotional safety. Now the people in the “happy wife” camp believe they’re creating safety by keeping things happy all the time. But what this actually does is create an unsafe environment to be authentic. And both partners end up worrying about creating judgment and reactivity from the other.

ALSO READ:  Evan Marc Katz: No More Bad Dates at TEDxStJohns (Full Transcript)

Now the second principle, in dynamic tension with the first one, is the principle of spark. And spark is about creating that sizzle, that mystery, a little bit of separation, that attraction between the two of you. So you see the paradox here? How can you be at once both close and safe and cuddly and mm? And also separate and sizzling? Well, I’ll tell you exactly how you do that. But first, you might be wondering how a PhD organic chemist like myself came to be studying relational chemistry. So picture this.

From Chemistry Lab to Life Lab

There I was in my white lab coat on a Saturday afternoon in the lab. Yes, a Saturday afternoon. Very carefully pipetting yet another radioactive solution over and over again into a series of seemingly endless tiny wells. When the voice of my heart broke through, “You’re not supposed to be doing this anymore.”

I didn’t want to believe it because walking away from a 10-year scientific career is no small thing. But I knew it was right. You see, I had never had a single class in all my years of scientific education in human bonding. I had learned everything about molecular bonding. But how to handle my own emotions and my partner’s, good luck, you’re on your own. How to communicate non-defensively, no way, we’re not going to teach you that. How to have great sex, absolutely not. And so as a result, I was stuck in my head, trying to logic my way through life.

I suppressed my emotions. I had an inner critic that was running the show. I felt disconnected from my husband and despaired of ever having much pleasure in sex. If you’ve ever been there, you know that this is just not a sustainable way to live.

So that day in the lab, I hung up my lab coat and walked out forever. I made the decision to go travel the world for a year to say yes to what scared me. At the end of those travels, at an age when most of my friends were getting pregnant or getting promoted, I found myself alone and divorced on a tropical island in a wooden hut with no idea if I’d ever be employable again. And this was hands down the best thing that ever happened to me.

A New Education in Human Bonding

I spent the next four years on that island getting the education in human bonding that I had never had. I ran the most important experiment of my life on myself. You see, I finally gave myself permission to turn that lens of curiosity that I used on my science experiments on my own relationships and sex life. I went to an entirely new school and studied with new teachers in the fields of mindfulness, yoga, emotional intelligence, and sexuality.

I finally realized why was it laudable to study sex between molecules, but shameful to study sex between humans?