Skip to content
Home » Great Leadership Comes Down To Only Two Rules: Peter Anderton (Transcript) 

Great Leadership Comes Down To Only Two Rules: Peter Anderton (Transcript) 

Here is the full transcript of Peter Anderton’s talk titled “Great Leadership Comes Down To Only Two Rules” at TEDxDerby conference.

Listen to the audio version here:

TRANSCRIPT:

The Essence of Leadership

What I want to talk to you about today is Chocolate Hobnobs. What can Chocolate Hobnobs teach us about leadership? Well, a lot more than you might think. I’ve got three messages that will apply to each one of us today, whatever you think of Chocolate Hobnobs, and whether you see yourself as a leader or not.

Because you don’t actually have to be a politician, or a four-star general, or some sort of chief executive to be a leader. Actually, every single one of us can make a difference. Every single one of us is a leader in some way or another, because leadership isn’t actually about position. Leadership is about who you are.

But the real message of leadership has been buried deep over the years. The last time I Googled leadership, I got 760 million results in half a second. It’s impossible to find what we really want in all that information. I don’t know if you know, but the average person in the UK spends up to six months of their life searching for everyday things like keys and mobile phones. Six months!

And of course, the more stuff we have, the harder we have to search for the things that we’re looking for. Imagine searching through 760 million things to find your keys. And that’s the problem that we see today, because thousands of different leadership models and concepts have all come together to form this complex tapestry, like some sort of remarkable chemical formula that we assume only university professors can understand.

Leadership Simplified

Well, I’m here to tell you today that leadership is actually very simple. It’s not easy, but it is simple. And everything you ever need to know about leadership comes down to one of two simple, but very powerful rules. And if you grasp these rules and put them into practice, you cannot fail to inspire others, be they teams, organisations, or communities.

So why this explosion in leadership theories that causes so much confusion? Well, I think the problem is this. Too many of us have stopped searching for the keys of leadership, and we’ve started looking for the silver bullet instead, constantly on the lookout for something new, this wonderful thing that once I understand this, everything will change and fall into place. If I can just take my shiny new silver bullet and load it into my barrel and fire, all will be well.

And yet rather than producing simplicity, it’s just produced more and more complexity. More and more models have buried the true message of leadership deeper and deeper and deeper. And these two rules are lost somewhere underneath all the stuff. I’m going to let you into a secret.

People have been practising leadership for a very long time, and the essence of leadership goes back for centuries, millennia even. Now I’m not actually a head of state. I’m not a professor. I’m not Einstein.

An Engineer’s Perspective on Leadership

I’m an engineer with a passion for leadership, simplicity, and alignment. And I’ve seen leadership from all sorts of angles. I’ve seen great successes, and I’ve seen some monumental failures. And because I’ve learned more from my failures than from my successes, I’m going to share with you my ultimate failure today.

Because I used to be the man who made chocolate Hobnobs. It was the problem child of a factory not so far from here. And I was brought in as the young hotshot who would be able to save the day, irrespective of what the line had done to my two predecessors. How little we knew.

Now before we join my worst ever shift, we’re going to go on a journey. And the journey we’re going to go on is the journey of leadership. And it’s a journey through time and space. We’re going to head back to the sixth century BC, and we’re going to join that too. But on our way there, let’s just recognise that in under 15 minutes, we’re going to go through centuries of leadership thinking.

So the one thing we can be sure of is we’re going to leave a lot out. So Lao Tzu believed that the leader was best when people barely knew he existed. That when his job was done, his aim fulfilled, the people would say we did it ourselves.

Historical Perspectives on Leadership

Not so far away, Sun Tzu was writing The Art of War, a book that’s on the recommended reading list for a lot of top executives today. And he believed that the general who advances without coveting fame, and who retreats without fearing disgrace, whose only thought is to protect his country and do good service for his sovereign, is the jewel of the kingdom.

The Roman consul, Cicero in the first century BC, absolutely understood that the leader could only deliver results through other people. He had to focus his attention on others if anything was going to happen, if anything was going to change.

ALSO READ:  The Journey of Train 18: Sudhanshu Mani (Full Transcript)

Jesus in the first century taught, “If anyone would be great amongst you, let him be your servant.” His disciples likened the relationship between leaders and followers to the relationship between a shepherd caring for their flock. All of these agreed that leadership wasn’t actually about dominion, leadership was about service.

Until we come to the 16th century, and our cunning Italian Niccolò Machiavelli wrote his famous book, The Prince, he believed it was all about the leader. The leader had to maintain power at all costs. The focus was entirely upon them. They would maintain power by force or by deceit, if necessary. And in fact, they would need to appear to be one thing, whilst in reality being something else altogether.

The Evolution of Leadership Theory

And we’re still clearing up his mess today.