Read here the full transcript of Professor Dan Jones’ talk titled “How To Recognize A Master Manipulator” at TEDxReno 2024 conference.
Listen to the audio version here:
TRANSCRIPT:
The Nature of Manipulation
Have you ever known someone that seemed totally genuine? Your conversations were engaging, and you agreed on so much. But then it happened. While claiming to have your back, they violated your trust, and you learned that much of your relationship was a lie.
Making matters worse, maybe you even blamed yourself, wondering what you did wrong. Now, if this sounds familiar, then you and I have something in common. We’ve both been manipulated. And I bet those who don’t think they’ve been manipulated probably don’t realize it yet.
In fact, as we speak, it is likely that someone, somewhere, is planning to manipulate you. And because it happens to everyone, it’s not only more common than we think, but it shows how little we know about how to prepare ourselves for it. As a professor who’s studied manipulation for more than two decades, I think we need to fix that. It’s unacceptable to me that the science of manipulation has done little to help those being manipulated.
We have failed you as a science. So I want to talk about how to recognize different types of manipulative people, and what to do when you find yourself face-to-face with them. We can learn to turn the tables on these manipulative types by using their strategic thinking against them. With romance schemes, catfishing, investment fraud, and workplace manipulation all around us, the study of manipulation has never been more important.
The Dark Triad: Understanding Manipulative Personalities
But the study of manipulative people has a fragmented history. There were forensic researchers studying psychopathy. There were clinical researchers studying narcissism. And there were behavioral researchers studying Machiavellianism.
Now, you’ve probably heard the term psychopath or sociopath. You’ve almost certainly heard the term narcissist before. Have you even used it to describe an ex? But many don’t know what we mean by Machiavellianism, the masters of manipulation.
And you know, a lot of people don’t even pronounce it right. Niccolò Machiavelli was a political advisor who advocated for ruthless and duplicitous tactics. And those who agreed with Machiavelli’s philosophy tended to be manipulative in their personal lives. Machiavellianism represents a cautious and rational way of gaining power.
They manipulate, but they do so strategically, which makes them exceptionally dangerous. And there are no warnings or obvious signs. Individuals high in Machiavellianism seek power any way they can get it, and they’re in it for the long run. When referring to all three traits, psychopathy, narcissism, and Machiavellianism, researchers simply call them the Dark Triad.
The Evolution of Dark Triad Research
In 2002, my mentor Del Paulhus and his student Kevin Williams wanted to draw researchers’ attention to the fact that we were studying these traits in isolation, and the three literatures needed to merge. By the time that 2022 ended, the original Dark Triad paper had been cited over 6,000 times, and its presence has forever changed the conversation on manipulation. But despite more than 20 years of rapid growth, I was sad on its 20th anniversary. Sad because after all the time knowing the harm they cause, virtually no research has been done on how to protect us from them.
The Most Dangerous of the Dark Triad
Many people consider psychopathy to be the most dangerous of the Dark Triad traits. I disagree. Perhaps in a dark alley or in a moment one-on-one, that may be true. But psychopaths lack the strategic planning necessary to maintain power for any length of time.
So while a narcissist will charm you, and a psychopath will mug you, a Machiavellian will invade you. And they’re not doing it to look good, so they won’t stumble on their egos. They’re not doing it for thrills, so they won’t act on impulse. A well-prepared Machiavellian is like the lion you don’t see, and they’ve been planning their attack longer than you realize.
Understanding Machiavellianism
Now I’ve been studying all three Dark Triad traits for most of my career, but I’ve spent most of my time studying Machiavellianism. Now I say trait because it’s important to understand these people will not change. To date, there are no effective interventions getting these people to care about others. Getting matters worse, Machiavellianism is a sneaky trait in every respect possible.
Yes, they’re sneaky in how they deal with people, but they’re also sneaky in that they predict harm less consistently than psychopathy. In fact, virtually any harmful outcome predicted by Machiavellianism is likely to be predicted even more eagerly by a psychopath. So some have called into question whether we need to study Machiavellianism, or will it forever play second fiddle to the better predictor of psychopathy?
Well, through a series of experiments, my colleagues and I have shown it is when Machiavellians act, not what they’ll do, that differentiates them from psychopathy.
Psychopaths are impulsive and driven by immediate gratification. They simply act and do not think twice about it. Narcissists are driven by their egos, and whether it’s a good idea or not, they’ll claim a sense of superiority to the death. But individuals high in Machiavellianism weigh the pros and cons of a given action and take the path that benefits them the most.
The Upside of Machiavellianism
So if Machiavellianism consists of all this strategic manipulation, is there an upside to the trait? Because they do adapt well to their environment. As it turns out, yes. My colleagues and I have been studying how individuals high in Machiavellianism deal with it when they personally have a leader or a co-worker who is manipulative.
And when we studied which of the dark triad traits did best under this destructive leadership, it was indeed Machiavellianism. Under destructive leaders, individuals high in Machiavellianism actually had better mental health outcomes and were promoted at a higher rate than all other types of people.
