Professor Jeffrey Sachs Reveals TRUTH on US Iran War (Transcript)

I mean, what are your thoughts on Trump and his kind of snap decision to go ahead and involve the United States in another war?

The Deep State and American Foreign Policy

PROFESSOR JEFFREY SACHS: I think you put your finger on the two critical points. One is how US foreign policy is set, what is the role of the Israel lobby, for example, and the second is mindset. So let me take each of these on, please.

You know, President Putin, Russian President Putin said something very interesting in 2017 in an interview that he gave with the French newspaper Le Figaro. And I always found it quite striking. He said that he had dealt with many American presidents by that point, by 2017. And he said they come into power with ideas, but then men in dark suits and briefcases with blue ties come and explain to them the reality, and you never hear of those ideas again.

And what Putin was saying, and he knows it well, given his own political history. The CIA, the deep state in the United States, the intelligence community, the Pentagon, the armed services committees of Congress, the military contractors, they’re the men in the dark suits and the blue ties and the briefcases, and they run foreign policy far more consistently than any individual president.

And while we see Trump on the social media and all the rest, there is a deep state. There’s no doubt about it. There is a continuity of policy that stretches over decades, and we’re first seeing that played out. American foreign policy for decades has done Israel’s bidding, not automatically, not immediately, but at least eventually.

The United States has gone to war or supported wars on behalf of Netanyahu for 30 years. The Iraq war, the overthrow of the Syrian government, the war in Libya, Israel’s invasion of Lebanon, the wars that the US supported in Sudan and in Somalia, and now the new war in Iran. These have been on Netanyahu’s checklist all along.

But the second element is mindset. What does Trump think he’s doing? I actually think he believes the statements that he uttered in the last 24 hours, which are fatuous, that, well, job’s all done now. Iran will concede at the negotiating table, and we’ll get back to peace. And I think peace in capital letters, exclamation point, exclamation point.

Trump thinks he’s ended the war with a sortie of bombers, but he has started a much broader war. And we saw within hours and completely predictably and understandably that Iran launched missiles into Tel Aviv and the Houthis launched their attack on Israel as well. This is the start of escalation. This isn’t over.

So there’s a mindset which is extraordinarily arrogant in US leadership that we call the shots. So Trump probably believes that he’s not entering a prolonged war. He probably thinks, well, I got the job done. But this is a kind of stupidity compounding on this underlying deep state reality.

The Reality of the Nuclear Strikes

CYRUS JANSSEN: Oh, absolutely. I think it’s quite amazing with President Trump, you know, sending out a tweet saying, you know, congratulating the US Military. Great job, guys. We’ve done the job. We’ve successfully bombed Iran. Now’s the time for peace. And it’s just amazing that that could go out in the same message, you know, we’re bombing somebody, but it’s now time for peace.

And I want to talk a little bit specifically about Iran. I mean, there’s been a lot of speculation. Of course, Donald Trump has said, okay, now their nuclear facility has been completely destroyed. There’s zero chance it’s done, it’s over. But there’s also new reports coming out that essentially these bombs just hit the entrance of the facility. This nuclear matter, everything that was in this facility was already moved away months ago.

So it’s really a nothing burger almost. You know, this doesn’t actually just really for show. I mean, do you have any insights into, you know, were these strikes actually, did they actually harm Iran at all? Did it actually stop this nuclear program from Iran?

PROFESSOR JEFFREY SACHS: I have absolutely no inside knowledge or technical insight, but I have a lot of experience, which is that claims like this are ridiculous. The idea that Iran just sat around and waited for these well announced strikes to occur is fatuous. We already heard from President Putin that there are many sites around Iran that are engaged in their nuclear operations. And that’s no doubt true.

It’s also very typically the case that we announce victories on the basis of these individual actions that are preludes to very long wars. We’ve done that time and time again. So I have absolutely no technical knowledge of what happened last night. But on general principles, we should have a lot of skepticism.

The fact that highly destructive missiles that hit Tel Aviv were launched shortly after this definitive operation should tell us enough that these ideas that this clean strike has somehow done the job is absolutely, absolutely not the case.

Understanding Iran’s Role in the Middle East

CYRUS JANSSEN: Yeah, I think social media has been very interesting to look at the last 24 hours. Obviously the MAGA crowd, you know, a lot of them are saying this is a great victory. The US Military is the number one in the world. We’re amazing. But I think Trump is also, you know, at the same time losing a lot of his base. Many Americans very frustrated that this, again, is another new war for the United States.

Professor, I wanted to ask you a question about Iran and you know, its position in the Middle East. And you know, we’ve always heard that Iran is the aggressor, you know, and for example, Israel had to launch this attack against Iran because it was in danger. Right. I mean, I think it’s very well understood this was an unprovoked attack from Israel to start this off about a week ago.

But can you let us know what’s missing from this picture? I mean, what do more Americans and Westerners need to understand about Iran’s role in the region and what they were doing and everything that’s going on there?

The Historical Context of US-Iran Relations

PROFESSOR JEFFREY SACHS: Of course, this is a long and rich story because Iran of 5,000 years, it’s one of the great civilizations in the world. It was the first great empire of the ancient world at large scale. Interestingly, in the Hebrew Bible, it is the Persian leader Cyrus, who is called the Messiah of the Jewish people because actually going back to the sixth century B.C. it is the Persian Shah of Shah Cyrus, who rescues the Jewish people or the Jewish leaders from their captivity by the Babylonians and enable them to return to rebuild the temple of Jerusalem.

So the history of the Jewish people and the Iranian people itself goes back two and a half millennia. This is actually quite interesting because again, in so many cases, there’s no intrinsic reason for the kind of hatred and vitriol and supposed civilizational clash. There is a complete lack of understanding backed by and provoked by propaganda, by deliberate misreading of history and so forth.

But I start with this point because Iran is the heir of a very proud and very ancient civilization. And Iran, there’s a lot to say about it. But one thing that they do know is the United States and Britain did a lot to undermine Iran’s place in the world in the second half of the 20th century.

The 1953 Coup and Its Consequences

In 1953, which is a right starting point for the current situation, Britain and the US took great offense to a radical idea of the Iranian Prime Minister at the time named Mossadegh, who said, you know, the oil under our sand is ours. And the British and the Americans said, no, no, no, no, that’s ours and you’re never going to get it. And they overthrew Mosaddegh and put in a police state. And that police state lasted until 1978.

Then the Shah of Iran, who was physically ailing but was had profoundly alienated his society through police state measures for decades, was overthrown in the Iranian revolution. When the United States took in the ailing Shah for his cancer treatment, students overran the US Embassy and held Americans hostage. And that became one of the great causes of America that we’ve been humiliated and Iran is our mortal enemy.

And in fact there was no attempt, maybe it’s too much to ask, but there was no attempt whatsoever in those days to understand what is this about. Why do the Iranians express their hatred to the United States? There was no history. Americans are not good at history. They don’t want to take any responsibility, they don’t want to understand any background.

The US-Backed Iraq War Against Iran

But suffice it to say that starting with the hostage taking and the fear of this new regime that took power in 1979, the United States almost immediately went into combat against it. We armed and funded Saddam Hussein in Iraq next door to launch and continue a very, very violent war against Iran that killed a lot of people, hundreds of thousands of people. So actually the war with Iran already goes back to the 1980s when the United States supported the next door neighbor to attack the new regime.

Well, the Israelis came to view this government as a mortal threat because the Iranian regime and Islamist regime said that they supported the Palestinian cause. So do I, by the way, for a two state solution. So this is not a radical point. The idea that Palestinians should have political self determination is an idea that more than 180 of the 193 UN member states actively express.

But for Israel, and especially for this movement that Netanyahu leads, this Likud political party and this Greater Israel movement, any supporter of the Palestinian cause is a mortal enemy. So Iran became mortal enemy number one of Likud and of Netanyahu’s Israel. And then because of the power of the Israel lobby in the United States, which also has a lot of interesting roots but is a very, very powerful part of the U.S. deep State, Iran not only was an enemy because of the hostage taking and the fact that they were standing up for things that the Americans didn’t want, but also because Iran was the enemy, number one of Israel.

Netanyahu’s Clean Break Strategy

In 1996, Netanyahu and his American political buddies released a political document called Clean Break. And Clean Break said, you don’t fight groups like Hamas and Hezbollah by fighting these militant groups head on. You fight them by bringing down the governments that support them. So what Netanyahu envisioned was remaking the governments of the Middle east in Israel’s image, if I could put it that way.

In other words, we, Israel, together with the United States, will overthrow any governments that are supporting the Palestinian cause, and especially these Palestinian militant groups. Iran was number one on the list. So these new events are the culmination of 30 years of Netanyahu’s campaign to bring the United States into war with Iran.

Iran’s Diplomatic Efforts and the Nuclear Deal

Now, one crucial point that people need to understand and is so contrary to the propaganda that we hear day in and day out, is that the Iranians for decades have been saying, we want normal relations with the United States. We do not want nuclear weapons. We want the US to end its sanctions. We are open for an agreement in which we are inspected and monitored. We want a civilian nuclear power program, as any country can have. We do not want nuclear weapons.

Indeed, the religious supreme leader issued decades ago a religious ruling of fatwa that said, Iran will not have nuclear weapons. We don’t want them. Iran said that to the International Atomic Energy Agency. Iranians, academics, and senior officials have been coming to me for decades saying, we want to negotiate with your government. We want to normalize relations.

And of course, and I want everyone to remember this most basic fact. In 2016, President Obama actually negotiated with the Iranians an agreement to stop the nuclear weapons program ever. Not even actually, let me put that more properly, to prevent a nuclear weapons program, because the Iranians weren’t engaged in one, but to make sure that there was verification, monitoring, limits to the uranium enrichment and all the rest. And that was what’s called the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or the JCPOA.

In other words, an agreement was reached a decade ago. And what happened? Donald Trump got elected, the Israel lobby went to work, and Trump walked out of the JCPOA. So he abandoned the agreement that would have obviated all of this.

And since then, I’ve been speaking to Iranians month in, month out, visiting Tehran, speaking to senior officials that I meet in various meetings around the world. They’re always asking me, do you have an inroad to the White House. Why don’t they listen to us? We want to negotiate. This was true during the entire Biden period. It was true, of course, at the start of the Trump administration. How many times did they ask, do you know anyone in the White House? We want to negotiate.

We, the Israel lobby works overtime to prevent the American people from understanding any of this. And it’s all one giant lie that the only way is through war and regime change. But that’s Netanyahu’s approach. And we’re suckers. And Trump is the most recent one to be suckered by it. And it’s, you know, it’s, if it were just Trump, that would be one thing, but he’s bringing in us and he’s bringing in the whole world into this latest round of disaster.

CYRUS JANSSEN: Yeah, yeah, I appreciate you giving us the history there, Professor Sachs. And incredible. I mean, that we, you know, now look back and we see that we had a deal in place, obviously 10 years ago. Trump got rid of it. The Iranians have been there. I mean, even we’ll go back to March of this year. And Tulsi Gabbard had gone on testified, saying that they do not want a nuke. You know, in all of our expert analysis and, you know, Donald Trump being advised they don’t want a nuke. They don’t. They’re not building a nuke. And he just denies that. It just shows the incredible amount of control that Netanyahu and the Israeli lobby have over our government, which is just criminal. I mean, it’s just amazing.

The Seven Wars Strategy

PROFESSOR JEFFREY SACHS: And, you know, for the first months of the administration, people told me in or near the White House, don’t worry, don’t worry, we’re negotiating. They may actually, in this weird way, as I said, this delusional way, believe it, because even Trump’s post, okay, we did this bombing, now it’s all over. Now all they have to do is concede at the negotiating table. It may be their delusion.

In fact, it’s so peculiar, but so predictable. Also, again, this clean break strategy of Netanyahu going back 30 years, after nine eleven, we know, brought about a list of seven wars to pursue. And Americans should understand what just happened yesterday is the seventh one on the list. Those seven countries included Iraq. They included Syria, Lebanon, Somalia, Sudan, Libya and Iran. And six out of those seven we’ve been engaged in quite actively in most cases. The seventh just started yesterday.

Regime Change and Its Consequences

CYRUS JANSSEN: It’s this very troubling times ahead. And I do want to ask you a question about the Supreme Leader in Iran. I mean, do you feel that this is, there’s an element of wanting a regime change? Is this going to be the next goal for the United States is to go in and actually take out the Supreme Leader, install a coup government? And a follow up question to that, a part two would be, I’ve seen a lot of people trying to say the argument that the Iranian people want this, right? They want the regime to be toppled, they want the leader to be replaced. You know, some people even gone as far as saying that they support the US Government, which is ludicrous. I mean, no one wants to get bombed on and certainly see civilians being killed. But give me know your thoughts on is this a potential regime change that we’re looking at? Is the US going to try to install a coup government next?

PROFESSOR JEFFREY SACHS: Well, Netanyahu is absolutely explicit about it, that the Iranian regime needs to be brought down. Trump has made some, you know, especially ugly posts on Truth Social in recent days. We know where the Supreme Leader is. We could kill him at any moment. We’re not going to do so, but, or, you know, we’ll see by the way, this crudeness that you cannot imagine a President of the United States engaging in kind of mob talk, even though the mob talks in a more sophisticated way than this. So it’s very disheartening. But there’s no doubt what Netanyahu wants.

But this whole regime change business, this is core to America’s foreign policy approach. We’ve engaged in probably a hundred regime change operations that is mainly CIA led or deep state led or Pentagon led since the beginning of the post World War II era. There’s an excellent book called Covert Regime Change by Professor Lindsay O’Rourke, written in 2017, which documented very carefully, very systematically, 64 covert regime change operations between 1947 and 1989. She was a student of the great political scientist John Mearsheimer.

And this regime change idea is built deeply into American foreign policy. It is also the case, as Professor O’Rourke documents, that it doesn’t go well. You know, many of the operations fail. Those that succeed also fail because instead of creating a new stable government, you end up with a cascade of coups, or you end up with civil war, or you end up with a government structure much worse than the one that you thought you were bringing down and so forth. So there is a deep naivete and a pattern to all of this.

I should say, by the way, that Israel’s foreign policy approach is twofold. One is to assassinate foreign leaders and the other is to drag the US into Israel’s wars. So Israel also very much plays by the idea that we just need to take out the supreme leader or kill the head of the military or take out the head of Hezbollah and all will be fine. Of course, nothing could be further from the truth.

The wars and conflicts that we have are based on politics, not on individuals. The issue with Israel and Hamas is not about the leader of Hamas or the leader of Hezbollah or the leader of Iran. It’s about the fact that 8 million Palestinians are under Israel’s oppressive thumb and are seeking their political self determination which could come with a two state solution once again. So the whole idea of regime change as the elixir which is going to fix the situation is delusional.

Looking Ahead: What’s Next?

CYRUS JANSSEN: Yeah, yeah. Professor Sachs, I have one final question for you this evening and thank you so much again for all your time today. Where do we go from here? And you know what, what is your predictions for how this is going to unfold? I mean, I think you mentioned earlier, this is the start of a new war. Do you see this blowing up into a much larger regional conflict? Is this America’s next forever war? What should American citizens, what should we be demanding from our government and preparing ourselves for in the future?

The Path to Peace in the Middle East

PROFESSOR JEFFREY SACHS: Well, rather than predicting, which I’m not very good at, I would say what should we do? So I’ll take that part of the question. What we should be doing is actually trying to end the perpetual wars that have raged in the Middle East under Netanyahu’s watch.

And to go to the crux of the matter, and that is, believe it or not, a two state solution in Palestine and Israel would also stop the wars in Lebanon, Syria, Iran and across the Red Sea in the Horn of Africa and North Africa. Because so much of this is interconnected and so much of it comes back to the idea that there are militancies because the Palestinian cause finds support across the Muslim region, the Arab countries and the Islamic states more broadly.

More than 180 countries in the world with 95% of the world population say, come on, two states, according to international law, a state of Israel, which by the way would be state 78% of the British Palestine and a state of Palestine alongside. Living in peace is absolutely available, is practical, is the way to have peace.

And in that context, one could have peace, one could stop this underlying reason for Israel’s incessant wars of choice and the United States could actually do what Donald Trump thinks he has done, and that is to have Iran at the negotiating table, which Iran has been the one pleading for for decades, to make sure that there is no nuclear arms developed.

Are we going to do this? Well, it would be actually straightforward to do to make peace in the Middle East. Are we going to do it? No, most likely not. I don’t want to close the door on it because it’s so basically right. But are we likely to do it? Well, 30 years of experience tells us that no, we’re likely to remain on a path of violence, destruction and escalation that’s extraordinarily dangerous.

The Nuclear Reality

Let me add one more point, by the way, please. The world is filled with nuclear weapons. There are nine countries that have nuclear weapons. Several of them are strong allies of Iran. At least a couple of them, North Korea and Pakistan. You could imagine a situation in which they would make their nukes available to Iran.

The idea that you bomb three sites in Iran and you therefore end the issue of nuclear escalation is so stupid in its own right, because escalation of conflict means that we step ever closer to nuclear war. One way or another. We have to get our heads on straight about basic global realities.

And that is, if we want to avoid nuclear war, it doesn’t come by bombing three purported nuclear sites. It comes actually by making peace and then moving towards nuclear disarmament, which is the US Obligation, together with the other signatories of the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty.

So we need a completely different approach. It’s within reach. It’s not even complicated. But it’s unlikely to be the one that this administration follows.

Closing Remarks

CYRUS JANSSEN: Professor Sachs, I want to thank you so much for your time. Your insights are always just incredible. It’s always an amazing lesson to learn from you. And just thank you for all the work that you do. And we’re just very, very honored for your time today, sir.

PROFESSOR JEFFREY SACHS: Great to be with you. I appreciate it. Thanks a lot.

CYRUS JANSSEN: Thank you so much. You got it. Take care.

Final Thoughts

Well, everyone, it was an absolute pleasure to invite Professor Jeffrey Sachs for today’s exclusive interview. And I hope you enjoyed his incredible insights. You know, for me, it is incredible to hear the amazing history and the context that only Professor Sachs can provide. He honestly is one of the best geopolitical insiders in the entire world.

Whenever there’s a global conflict, Professor Sachs has his thumb on the details and provides incredible knowledge. As for myself, I cannot believe that the United States has officially launched itself in another conflict in the Middle East. But as Professor Sachs laid out in today’s interview, this has been 30 years in the making.

This has been the lifelong dream of Benjamin Netanyahu, who unfortunately, along with the Israeli lobby, controls so much power over the United States government. Where do we go from here? What happens next? Nobody really knows. But I guarantee you it’s not going to be a short walk for the United States. It’s not going to be a quick conflict.

Most definitely, the Middle East is going to be very unstable for the foreseeable future. But as always, you can count on this YouTube channel to give you the best interviews and the best insights. And I want to thank you all for your incredible support. Make sure that you drop a comment down below, let us know what you thought of today’s interview. And I can’t wait to see you all in our next video soon.

Related Posts

• President Trump on Operation Epic Fury Update (Transcript)
• President Trump Remarks on US, Israel Attacking Iran (Transcript)
• President Trump on Economy, Energy in Corpus Christi, TX (Transcript) 
• Bulwark Podcast: w/ Susan Glasser on Trump’s State of the Union address (Transcript)
• Douglas Macgregor: US-Iran Diplomacy Fail (Transcript)