Skip to content

Scott Ritter: Why Iran is Winning (Transcript)

Editor’s Notes: Join Judge Andrew Napolitano on Judging Freedom for a provocative and high-stakes analysis of the escalating conflict between the United States, Israel, and Iran with guest Scott Ritter. Ritter offers a blunt assessment of why he believes Iran is winning the war, labeling U.S. military actions as a “war of aggression” with devastating global consequences. The conversation delves into the logistical failures of current military strategies and the sheer impracticality of a successful ground invasion. This episode provides a critical perspective on the shifting power dynamics in the Middle East and what Ritter describes as a significant strategic defeat for the U.S. and its allies. (March 31, 2026) 

TRANSCRIPT:

“Undeclared wars are commonplace. Tragically, our government engages in preemptive war, otherwise known as aggression, with no complaints from the American people. Sadly, we have become accustomed to living with the illegitimate use of force by government. To develop a truly free society, the issue of initiating force must be understood and rejected.”

JUDGE ANDREW NAPOLITANO: What if sometimes to love your country you had to alter or abolish the government? What if Jefferson was right? What if that government is best which governs least? What if it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong? What if it is better to perish fighting for freedom than to live as a slave? What if freedom’s greatest hour of danger is now?

Hi everyone. Judge Andrew Napolitano here for Judging Freedom. Today is Tuesday, March 31, 2026. Scott Ritter will be with us in just a moment on why Iran is winning this war.

The War Against Iran: A War Crime

SCOTT RITTER: I mean, so many people have died. It’s murder. Let’s start. Let’s get just dead serious right off the bat. It’s a war crime. The United States is a nation that is committing the most egregious of war crimes — a war of aggression. This was a war of choice. There was no imminent threat from Iran. In fact, what had been articulated as an imminent threat by the United States — Iran’s nuclear program — was being resolved diplomatically. And then the United States and Israel carried out their surprise attack. When the Japanese bombed us, it was called the day of infamy. Imagine what the Iranians call it. But it was perfidy. Literally, we were operating under a flag of truce and then we attacked the Iranians.

So we are a war criminal state, and Pete Hegseth is a war criminal. And we have to start out by saying this because it frames everything that follows. America, wake up. Our government is committing crimes in your name, our name. We are a war criminal nation.

So now let’s take a look at this. Some people would say, well, the ends justify the means. I mean, if we get rid of the Iranian state and we can secure Middle East oil and all this stuff, what’s international law? We’ve been breaking it. We invaded and occupied Iraq back in 2003, spent the better part of a decade doing that, and thousands of Americans died. But nobody cares.

For all you people out there that say you support the troops — I just despise these people. Do you really support the troops? You’ve never supported them, because you haven’t gone to the VA and changed the colostomy bag of a guy that got his guts blown out. You haven’t held the hand of a wife or a daughter who has to sit there and stare at her husband or father drool into a cup because his brain has been addled by a roadside bomb.

Nobody cares about the American troops. We like them when they’re good looking and in uniform. But what happens when he comes back in a wheelchair, or a basket case, or he comes back with a drinking problem or a drug addiction because of the pain that was inflicted on his body, or the psychosis in his mind? Do you love him then? No. You walk away. You leave him abandoned. His guts are torn out and his heart’s torn out. America sucks as a nation. We don’t support our troops at all.

The Failed Objectives of Pete Hegseth’s War

SCOTT RITTER: So we’re talking about sending people out to fight and die in a war to achieve what? Pete Hegseth says that this is because we’re going to remove the regime in Iran. Forty-seven years those people have been tormenting America. Really? I think it’s America that’s been tormenting them. Iran hasn’t sanctioned us — we’ve been sanctioning them. Iran hasn’t assassinated our nuclear scientists — we’ve been assassinating theirs.

America, the stupidity of the American people is beyond belief. Buying into this notion that we’re going to get rid of the Ayatollah and suddenly the regime is going to collapse, and in the process of collapsing, we’ll get them to agree to get rid of their missiles — because that’s the other stated objective, to stop Iran from launching missiles and drones.

Well, the regime didn’t collapse. We killed Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The regime is still there. His son is now the Ayatollah. Yeah, we got rid of the one Ayatollah that said it was against the law to produce nuclear weapons, and we replaced him with another Ayatollah who said, “Who knows? Maybe we’ll have to reconsider this, because you guys attacked us.” Nuclear-armed nations attacking us when we’re supposed to be protected from this attack by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty — it says when you sign the treaty and enter a safeguards agreement, you’re sort of immune from this sort of thing. But nope, here comes the United States and Israel, because we don’t care about international law.

Bombing Iran, we didn’t collapse the regime. We made them stronger. So, Pete, you lost. If your job was to collapse the regime — they’re there, they’re winning, you’re losing.

Now, what about those missiles, Pete?