Skip to content

“I’m A 90s Liberal” – Rob Schneider on TRIGGERnometry (Transcript)   

Editor’s Notes: In this episode of Triggernometry, comedian Rob Schneider returns to discuss the shifting landscape of comedy and the cultural divide in America. Schneider reflects on his evolution from a “90s liberal” to a modern-day conservative, critiquing what he describes as a rise in authoritarianism and a decline in individual voices within late-night television. He also shares personal anecdotes about legendary comedians like Jerry Seinfeld and Richard Pryor while exploring the importance of maintaining free speech in an increasingly polarized society. This conversation offers a candid look at the intersection of humor, politics, and the challenges of being a contrarian in the current media climate. (April 25, 2026)  

TRANSCRIPT:

Welcome Back, Rob Schneider

KONSTANTIN KISIN: Rob Schneider, welcome back.

ROB SCHNEIDER: Thank you so much.

KONSTANTIN KISIN: Brother, it’s only been about a year. Last time we had you on the show, it was right after the election. Yeah, pretty much the biggest episode we’ve ever done, 2.5 million views. People absolutely loved it.

ROB SCHNEIDER: Thank you, very honored.

KONSTANTIN KISIN: It’s been 12 months and so much has happened, it’s crazy.

ROB SCHNEIDER: No, it seems like the Chinese— it’s not a proverb, but it’s basically—

KONSTANTIN KISIN: The curse.

ROB SCHNEIDER: The curse, yeah.

KONSTANTIN KISIN: May you live in interesting times.

ROB SCHNEIDER: We are living in very interesting times. A lot has happened since then. I think the realization is still sinking in to the liberals that they’ve lost power. And they are not giving up easily. That’s the demonstrations, the No Kings leftist demonstrations, as the former Soviets called them, the useful idiots. So they’re doing that.

And also there’s a wake-up. I mean, the fact just because the Republicans are in power that they can actually do all the stuff they want to do. It’s a wake-up call to realize, you know, you can’t. There’s some impediments to it. Love. We can’t do everything we’d like to, but we’d like to very much so.

The English Booker and Anglophile Humor

KONSTANTIN KISIN: Well, the only conversation you and our booker have is basically you impersonating his English accent on the phone and ripping him a new one. We all enjoy listening in as that happens.

ROB SCHNEIDER: No, I just like— he just assumes like, “No, I told you yesterday we’re coming at 1:30.” Yeah, but I didn’t agree, you asshole. “No, but I said I sent you a message, which means it’s going to happen automatically. I’m English, I make things happen. You still use our rules. You kept the rule of law and property rights. We owe you. So when I say a message, you’ll stick with it.”

FRANCIS FOSTER: I mean, he’s not wrong, is he?

ROB SCHNEIDER: No, he’s not wrong. But it is lovely though, because I find myself to be an Anglophile and all the best humor was that because we didn’t get the shitty stuff. Truthfully, I was never— I mean, no offense, but I was never into Benny Hill. But Monty Python, I mean, the It’s All Right, Jack, those great comedies, the Ealing comedies, that was the basis of great comedy.

And it’s because your people were so angry because I don’t think you participated in the Marshall Plan, so you didn’t get banked out like Germany. So you guys were still rationing, like, into the ’50s, and they were pissed. “We won the f*ing war.” So that was kind of similarly how I just got back from Hungary and the war never ended there. It just new occupiers came in.

So there was a beautiful thing that happened, I think, in English humor. Correct me if I’m wrong. But whereas there was still an intensity after the war and all the pressure leading up to it, you couldn’t wait to get rid of Churchill and then the next thing. So the comedy had an edge to it that I think led to eventually, I think it was ’61 when Peter Cook went on the Footlights. And then that was John Cleese and Eric Idle, I think, were watching that night and didn’t realize you can make fun of the establishment. I think he made fun of the Prime Minister, Peter Cook. And that was the beginning of the rise. And I think that led to another level, the high watermark of comedy in the 20th century, English Monty Python.

Peter Cook, Subtlety, and the Difference Between English and American Humor

FRANCIS FOSTER: Well, Peter Cook was one of our greatest ever satirists. Him and Dudley Moore, of course, had that famous partnership. But one of the things that people were taken aback with by Peter Cook at the time was how savage he was. And, you know, we were very much, “No, no, these are our betters, you can’t talk about them like that.” That’s very— and he just went in, he did not care. And it was quite shocking at the time.

But one of the things that I’ve noticed about American humor, and I love American humor, I love your stand-up, your comedies are great. Ours, we— it’s kind of the difference between heavy rock and jazz piano. Jazz piano is English because it’s a note.

ROB SCHNEIDER: It’s subtle.

FRANCIS FOSTER: It’s more subtle. It’s the notes you don’t play. That’s where the humor comes in.

ROB SCHNEIDER: Yes.

FRANCIS FOSTER: Whereas Americans, you like your power chords, you know.

ROB SCHNEIDER: It’s a hammer. But I think though, I like the subtlety of both, you know. When you could— I like telling a joke where I’m— the best thing for me when I’m doing stuff is like, it’s let the audience go, “I’m going to— I just want to get this out of my way first to get the joke in,” you know. And I go like, “You know, it’s good to be back in California, but like I had to move because I got little kids and it’s dangerous to have kids in public school in California.