Skip to content
Home » Joe Rogan Experience: #2428 with Michael P. Masters (Transcript)

Joe Rogan Experience: #2428 with Michael P. Masters (Transcript)

Here is the full transcript of biological anthropologist Michael P. Masters’ interview on The Joe Rogan Experience #2428, December 18, 2025.  

Brief Notes: Joe Rogan sits down with biological anthropologist Michael P. Masters to explore his bold “extratempestrial” hypothesis: that at least some UFOs and so‑called aliens are actually future humans time‑traveling back to study their own evolutionary past. Masters walks through the anatomical logic for why classic “grey” entities look like us with exaggerated future traits—bigger brains, smaller faces, weaker bodies—and how this lines up with millions of years of hominin evolution. The conversation dives into abduction accounts, UAP sightings, time‑travel physics, and recovered‑craft lore, asking whether advanced descendants could be using space‑time “bubbles” rather than interstellar spaceships to reach us. Along the way, they touch on Nazca mummies, ancient myths, black projects, AI, and why Masters believes a multidisciplinary scientific approach is the only way to make sense of the UFO mystery.

Disclosure and Steven Spielberg’s Influence

JOE ROGAN: Disclosure day. Very interesting.

MICHAEL P. MASTERS: Yeah, I’m excited for that.

JOE ROGAN: Yeah. He was always way ahead of the curve when it comes to the whole UAP, UFO stuff. You know, with Close Encounters of the Third Kind, he had that French scientist that was essentially modeled after Jacques Vallee. He’s always been, I would love to talk to him. I wonder how much he knows.

MICHAEL P. MASTERS: Is that an accident? Was he fed some information? Was he a part of disclosure the whole time? That’s what I’ve always wondered.

JOE ROGAN: I mean, what does that mean? Right. Because there hasn’t really been disclosure.

MICHAEL P. MASTERS: No, but it has to be a slow process too, right?

JOE ROGAN: You think so?

MICHAEL P. MASTERS: I don’t think. I mean, the whole idea is that they’re just sort of normalizing it. Right. Neuro linguistic programming, they call it, where you’re slowly getting people accustomed to these ideas.

Like the aspects of Close Encounters, for instance, where you have the radiation burns on the guy’s face, you have a time travel component where these World War II soldiers get out of the craft with the little beings and the bigger being and I mean, just seeding our culture with those little bits of information that might help later on down.

JOE ROGAN: That was in the 70s, wasn’t it? When was Close Encounters?

MICHAEL P. MASTERS: Yeah, I think it was in the 70s, late 70s, early 80s, maybe. Either way, I mean, a lot of stuff he’s done, like I rewatched the, what was it? Jeff Bridges, Starman. I think there’s a lot of elements of disclosure in that too.

I don’t know. I mean, obviously we don’t know who’s pulling the strings. We don’t know what’s going on. We don’t know who’s in charge. But it does make sense that if there is this thing that they know about that we’re supposed to know about, leak it out, do it slowly, get in our culture, get it in our media in different ways.

The Hal Puthoff Story and Government Disclosure Meetings

JOE ROGAN: You know the Hal Puthoff story, right, with George Bush? Do you know the story where they were talking about. Okay, Hal talked about it on my podcast, but he also talked about it in the Age of Disclosure documentary where they brought in him and a bunch of different prominent thinkers.

MICHAEL P. MASTERS: Yeah, I watched that episode and I watched the documentary.

JOE ROGAN: So to people that don’t know, I’ll just explain it. So they brought in him and a bunch of other prominent thinkers and they sat them down and said, essentially, we have recovered crashed UFOs, we have biological remains of these creatures.

We are considering releasing it to the public and we want to make an assessment of what are the pros and what are the cons. So we want to assign a numerical value that you’re estimating what kind of an impact it would be on government, finances, religion, et cetera.

MICHAEL P. MASTERS: Whether they should do it basically right.

JOE ROGAN: Whether or not they should release this information. And all of the people that were brought in came to the agreement that there was more con than there were pro and that formed their decision to not release it.

MICHAEL P. MASTERS: And didn’t he say at first he was pro disclosure? He was like, of course we should do this. And then after the conversation, he switched teams.

JOE ROGAN: Yeah, I don’t know about that. Maybe, perhaps.

MICHAEL P. MASTERS: I mean, he said that he went into it thinking, well, yeah, obviously we should do this. And then sort of was convinced otherwise after the conversation unfolded.

JOE ROGAN: Yeah, how could you be convinced? Whose decision should it be? If some people know, everyone should know. Yeah, it’s a humanity decision. I don’t think it should be in anybody’s hands to decide whether or not this information gets distributed.

MICHAEL P. MASTERS: And the implications too, if they have zero point energy, how would that solve the problems that we face today? There’s so many ramifications of it that, yeah, whose decision is it and why has it been kept from us?

I don’t buy that whole, Orson Welles, 1938, everybody freak out bullshit. I don’t think that’s the case. At least not anymore. It’s got to be something more to it than that.

Unity in the Face of External Threats

JOE ROGAN: It would certainly have, I don’t know if they factor this in, but a uniting element. You remember the Reagan speech where he, in front of the United Nations where he said, imagine how united we would be. We’d forget our differences if we were faced with an alien threat from another world.

I mean, just knowing that we are all united. I mean, how old are you?

MICHAEL P. MASTERS: 47.

JOE ROGAN: Okay, so you remember September 11?

MICHAEL P. MASTERS: Mm.

JOE ROGAN: One of the things that happened after September 11 was there was, it was a horrible tragedy, but there was a beautiful result temporarily where everybody was really united, really united.

There were American flags in everybody’s car in Los Angeles.