Skip to content
Home » The Science Behind Dramatically Better Conversations: Charles Duhigg (Transcript)

The Science Behind Dramatically Better Conversations: Charles Duhigg (Transcript)

Read here the full transcript of Charles Duhigg’s talk titled “The Science Behind Dramatically Better Conversations” at TEDxManchester 2024 conference.

Listen to the audio version here:

TRANSCRIPT:

The Experiment

I’m going to ask you to participate in an experiment. When you leave this room and go out into the world today, tomorrow, or whenever you feel like it, I’d like you to ask and answer one question of someone who’s a stranger. You might meet them on the bus or walking down the street. I’m going to show you the question, and then I’m going to ask you to ask and answer it. The question is: “When was the last time you cried in front of someone?”

Now, just out of curiosity, how many of you are really excited about this experiment? Not surprisingly, no hands went up whatsoever. And that makes sense, right? There can be nothing that seems more intimidating or less fun than finding a stranger, asking them when they cried in front of someone else, and then telling them about the time you cried in front of someone else.

But I’m going to try and convince you over the next few minutes that this experiment is not only worth doing, it’s worth doing whenever you can, because it will make your life better.

A Personal Story

To explain how I got to this, I have to tell you a little bit of a story about me and my wife. A few years ago, we got into this bad pattern. We’d been married for 20 years, but I would come home from a long day at the office (I was a reporter at the New York Times at that point) and I would start complaining about my day, about how I’m not appreciated enough. My wife, very reasonably, would offer me some great advice. She would say something like, “Why don’t you take your boss out to lunch and you guys can get to know each other a little bit better?”

Instead of being able to hear her, I would get even more upset. I would say things like, “Why aren’t you supporting me? You should be outraged on my behalf.” And she would get upset because I was attacking her for giving me good advice. This was not a good situation. Has anyone ever had an experience like this?

The Science of Communication

So I went and started talking to researchers who were studying communication. I asked them, “Why am I getting into this pattern?” They said, “Well, you’re making a mistake.”

We’re living through this golden age of understanding communication, really for the first time, because of advances in neural imaging and data collection. They said one of the big things we’ve learned is that we tend to think of a discussion as being just one conversation, right? We’re talking about one thing: my day, or the kids’ grades, or what to have for dinner. But what they said is that actually, each discussion contains many different conversations.

In general, these conversations tend to fall into one of three buckets:

  1. Practical conversations: Where we’re talking about what this is all about, what we’re really discussing.
  2. Emotional conversations: Where we’re talking about how we feel. My goal is to share my feelings, and I don’t want you to solve them. I want you to empathize.
  3. Social conversations: About who we are, the social identities that are important to us, how we relate to each other, and how we relate to society.

What the researchers said is that we’ve learned if people are having different conversations at the same moment, they can’t really hear each other. They can’t really connect.

The Matching Principle

In fact, this is exactly what was happening with me and my wife. I was coming home and having an emotional conversation. My wife was responding with a practical conversation. They are both legitimate conversations. But because we weren’t having the same conversation at the same moment, we weren’t really communicating with each other.

ALSO READ:  Transcript: Zoë Chance on How to Make a Behavior Addictive at TEDxMillRiver

Within neurology and psychology, this insight has become so important that it’s become known as the matching principle, which says that successful communication requires recognizing what kind of conversation is occurring and then matching each other.

Deep Questions: The Key to Connection

But how do we do that? Well, in schools, they’ve actually taught teachers to do this. If you are a school teacher, you’ll probably learn at some point that if a student comes up to you with a problem or they want something they want to talk about, you should ask them: “Do you want to be helped?” (which is a practical conversation), “Do you want to be hugged?” (which is an emotional conversation), or “Do you want to be heard?” (which is a social conversation). It seems to work. It seems like if you ask students what they need, they’ll tell you.

But of course, that is hard to do in real life. If you go up and ask someone at work if they want a hug, HR might get involved, so you might not want to do that. But luckily, there is another way of doing this for all of us normal people, which is to ask questions, and in particular, to ask a certain type of question known as a deep question.

A deep question is something that invites us to talk about our values or our beliefs or our experiences, and that can sound a little intimidating, but it’s actually much easier than it sounds.

For instance, instead of asking someone, “Where do you work?” you could ask them, “What do you love about your job?” Instead of asking someone, “Where did you go to high school?” you could say, “What was high school like? What did you learn there? What changed you there?”

Put differently, instead of asking about the facts of someone’s life, we should ask them how they feel about their life. Because when we do, they tend to reveal to us who they really are.