Skip to content
Home » AmericaFest 2025: Tucker Carlson on America First Movement (Transcript)

AmericaFest 2025: Tucker Carlson on America First Movement (Transcript)

Here is the full transcript of Tucker Carlson’s speech on “America First Movement & New ‘Deplatforming’ Agenda”, @AmericaFest 2025, in Phoenix, Arizona, Dec 19, 2025.

Brief Notes: Tucker Carlson takes the AmericaFest stage to defend the America First movement against what he calls a new “deplatforming and denunciation” craze emerging not from the left, but from parts of the right itself. Responding to Ben Shapiro and others who have attacked him and Candace Owens over Charlie Kirk–related conspiracies and alleged antisemitism, Tucker argues that weaponizing labels like “Nazi” and “racist” is just a recycled form of identity politics meant to shut down debate.

He lays out a simple test for every politician and commentator—can you clearly explain how your decisions put American citizens first?—and says anyone who cannot meet that standard has “no right to rule.” The speech closes with a call to build a broad coalition of ordinary Americans who reject race war narratives and demand concrete accountability from leaders instead of moral posturing and censorship.

Listen to the audio version here:

Introduction

TUCKER CARLSON: Thank you very much. Oh yeah. Thank you. Oh! Thank you. Walking out is always such a trip with these things. I just got here and I feel like I missed the first part of the program. I hope I didn’t miss anything meaningful. But I just want to say, I don’t think I did, no I’m just kidding. I watched it. I laughed. I laughed, that kind of bitter sardonic laugh that emerges from you when like, upside down world arrives. When your dog starts doing your taxes and you’re like, wait, it’s not supposed to work this way.

The Irony of Deplatforming at a Free Speech Event

To hear calls for like, deplatforming and denouncing people at a Charlie Kirk event, I’m like, what? This is hilarious. Yeah, this is hilarious. Actually one of the clips, I was listening to myself, thinking as I often do when I hear myself speak, which is never, because I never watch myself, but at these events they always play like the role of you, and I’m like, “that guy is pompous, whoo!” Sorry about that. We don’t see ourselves clearly.

But the prediction that, you know, at some point when Republicans took power again, which I did everything I could, you know, to help, and really felt that was important, I still think I was right, but I really thought that the impulse to deplatform people, or even to use the word platform as a verb, which it’s not, it’s a noun, don’t steal my nouns, deplatform and denounce, “why haven’t you denounced somebody else,” the whole like, Red Guard cultural revolution thing that we so hated and feared on the left, that we did everything we could to usher in a new time where you could have an actual debate.

Charlie Kirk’s Stand for Free Debate

I mean, this kind of was the whole point of Charlie Kirk’s public life, and I think that he died for it. I really believe that. And I know a lot about it because the last several months of Charlie’s life were devoted in part to arguing about this event, in fact, this speech, in fact, my speech here, which he asked me to do earlier this year, this summer, and was immediately put under just immense pressure from people who give money to Turning Point, I would assume good people, but who wanted him to take me off the roster.

And this has all become public, and the whole thing is so sad that I never talk about it, except to say Charlie stood firm in his often stated and deeply held belief that people should be able to debate, and that if you have something valid to say, if you’re telling the truth, you ought to be able to explain it calmly and in detail to people who don’t agree with you, and that you shouldn’t immediately resort to “shut up racist.”

Rejecting the Politics of Character Assassination

You shouldn’t immediately go to motive. By the way, “shut up racist” is the number one reason I voted for Donald Trump. And because I’m just sick of it. I mean, first of all, if I was a racist, if I was a bigot, I would just say so. Okay, it’s America, you’re allowed to be whatever kind of person you want. I’m not. I’m sincerely opposed, have always been, and will always be.

But the style of debate where you prevent the other side from talking or being heard because you immediately go to motive, “well, I wonder why you’re asking that question. I wonder why. Why are you asking that question? I detect in the question a certain evil in your soul.” And everyone listening should know that listening to you implicates them, and that they someday may be asked to denounce you, and that friendship is not a reason to defend someone. Love is no defense.

I kind of thought we’d reached the end of that, and as far as I’m concerned, we have. And I’m not going to play by those rules. I’m not going to engage in that. If someone doesn’t like what I think, fine with me, as long as I get to express it. That’s my view.

But since we’re on the topic, I think I should take the opportunity to explain why Charlie was under all this pressure, and I think Erica, who I just saw backstage, and whom I love, and who I can tell you is totally committed to continuing the core principle of Charlie’s public life, which is the right of every person to express what he believes, that is rooted in Christian faith.

We believe people should be able to say what they think because they have souls. They’re human beings created by God. They are not slaves. They are not animals. They are not objects. You cannot tell another human being to shut up, even shut up racists, because you don’t own him.