Skip to content
Home » Game Theory #24: The AI Apocalypse – Professor Jiang (Transcript) 

Game Theory #24: The AI Apocalypse – Professor Jiang (Transcript) 

Read the full transcript of Game Theory #24: The AI Apocalypse with Professor Jiang, May 12, 2026.  

Editor’s Notes: This lecture, titled “The AI Apocalypse,” explores the provocative intersection of artificial intelligence and occult philosophy, framing the pursuit of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) as a modern-day attempt to “create God”. Professor Jiang critiques the evolution of AI companies like OpenAI, arguing that their mission has shifted from humanitarian idealism toward the consolidation of power and the establishment of a global surveillance “empire”. By demystifying technical terms like “neural networks” and “deep learning,” the talk posits that AI is fundamentally an esoteric project that relies on human exploitation and massive energy-intensive infrastructure. Ultimately, the lecture warns of a looming apocalypse where the drive for total technological control and a digital “rapture” threatens to sacrifice human autonomy for a manufactured and dangerous perfection.  

TRANSCRIPT:

A Letter from David Bromwich

PROFESSOR JIANG: After I posted my class from last Thursday, my friend, as well as teacher, David Bromwich sent me an email. And what we’re going to do today is we’re going to read his email together. I asked for his permission, and he said that it’s okay for me to make public his email to me.

Okay, so he said, “I just watched your video. There’s a thought I’ve been meaning to pass on, and this latest talk crystallized it. You travel fast in your explanations with a satisfying definiteness, and say a lot of true things that a team of people say clear off.”

So what he’s saying is that my videos are getting very popular online because I provide some certainty, some clarity in a very unclear and uncertain time.

“The risk is simplification, which your audience won’t quite recognize for what it is, or won’t unless you give occasional notice of the fact.”

So this is a very fair criticism in that by saying clarity, I oversimplify ideas. And sometimes when people see someone who’s very confident, they don’t really remember that a lot of this is speculation and oversimplification for the sake of clarity.

Intellectual Speculation, Not Scholarship

So it’s very important for us to remember this fact that this is a class about intellectual speculation. Here we explore ideas that are not explored anywhere else, and often I will wing it, or I will make things up as I go along based on my intuition and based on my imagination. And it’s very interesting, but it’s not scholarship.

And my friend David Bromwich, he is actually one of America’s greatest scholars. So he’s just reminding us of the fact that we have to be very careful that in the exploration of ideas, we also want to be rigorous.

“I remarked something like this early in talks on the rise of Germany, romanticism, et cetera.” Yeah, so I do this a lot. “You give memorable abridgments of the history of ideas and imagination. What needs underlying is the amount that is interpretation of an emphasis all your own.”

Okay, so again, I hate to remind everyone of this, but this is all my speculation. And I’m just presenting frameworks and ideas for you to explore by yourself.

On the Reading of Paradise Lost

“Emphatically, so in your reading of Paradise Lost, it’s an allegory of necessity of transgression for the sake of knowledge, whereby Adam and Eve instead of all become joint heroes of the fable. So it’s Blake’s reading and a powerful intuition, but it probably isn’t the way most readers take the poem, let alone the canonical national reading to identify 17th century New England and the US ever after, okay?”

So this is a very fair criticism. And he should know because he is one of America’s major professors of English literature. I studied English literature under him, and he knows Paradise Lost very well. And he’s absolutely right in that I am offering you a very minority interpretation of Paradise Lost.

Why I’m doing so will be clear as this semester comes to an end. Because for the rest of the semester, I want to focus on artificial intelligence and the occult. And so it’s very important for us to understand occult ideas embedded in the great books such as Paradise Lost, okay?

So again, this is a very fair criticism in that I’m not presenting to you the majority understanding of these texts. And I should have done that to begin with.

Gershom Scholem and the Kabbalah

“You struggle on a more risky terrain in viewing a Jewish Gnostic derivation from the Kabbalah as the national ideology of Israel. I know this material from Gershom Scholem’s essay, ‘Redemption Through Sin.'”

Okay, so Gershom Scholem is probably the most famous academic in Israel. He’s no longer alive, but he’s in the Kabbalah academically. And his interpretation of the Kabbalah is very much in line with my own, even though I myself never read Gershom Scholem.

And actually what’s interesting is that Gershom Scholem had a very huge influence on a man named Harold Bloom.

HAROLD BLOOM is, or was, America’s greatest literary critic, and he had a huge influence on David Bromwich, who then had a huge influence on me, okay? It isn’t an element of a settler religiosity, so far as I know, or conservative reception of the Torah, any more than it was of a socialist idealism of the left Zionist of 1948 who set the political tone of Israel until 1967.

Again, this is my problem, where I should have gone into the different ideologies of Israel and shown that this Gnostic understanding of the Kabbalah is an extreme version, okay? The shorthand leads you into a kind of business that can easily be misunderstood.

Thus, in talking about the support of non-Israeli Jews for the Jewish state, you said that throughout the world, Jews are wealthy. Again, this is my problem, where I make rationalizations, because I’m moving too fast, I’m oversimplifying, and often I’m working from intuition as opposed to rigorous scholarship. Watch out. The world is full of people who want to misunderstand what you mean, and they will separate words and phrases from the context at the drop of a hat.

On Intellectual Speculation and Public Scrutiny

So when I started this class about two years ago, I was using this class and this platform as a way for me to explore ideas with a larger world.