Skip to content
Home » Basement #007: w/ Hugh Newman on Giant Skeletons, Sumerian Myths, and Megaliths (Transcript)

Basement #007: w/ Hugh Newman on Giant Skeletons, Sumerian Myths, and Megaliths (Transcript)

Editor’s Notes: In this episode of The Why Files: Operation Podcast: Basement #007, host AJ sits down with author and explorer Hugh Newman to delve into the megalithic mysteries that are rewriting the timeline of human history. The conversation explores groundbreaking discoveries at ancient sites like Karahantepe and Göbekli Tepe, which reveal sophisticated engineering and precision astronomy dating back over 11,000 years. From investigating secret, bricked-up caves under the Giza Plateau to discussing the controversial evidence for giant skeletons, this episode challenges mainstream archaeology with a multi-disciplinary approach. Whether you’re curious about the true identity of the Sphinx or the existence of a universal ancient unit of measurement, Hugh Newman provides a fascinating look at the secrets our ancestors left behind. (Mar 17, 2026)

TRANSCRIPT:

Introduction

AJ GENTILE: Today I’m talking with Hugh Newman. He’s an author, explorer, and the founder of the Megalithomania Conference, which just hit its 20th year. And Hugh doesn’t sit behind a desk and theorize. He goes out to these sites and gets his hands dirty. He co-discovered a winter solstice alignment at Karahan Tepe, one of the oldest engineered sites on earth. We’re talking 11,400 years old. And what he’s finding there pushes back the timeline on everything we thought we knew about early civilization.

HECKLEFISH: It pushes back the timeline again. At this point they should just leave a blank page and say, “We’ll get back to you.”

AJ GENTILE: In this conversation, we get into Gobekli Tepe, underground cities, standardized units of measure that shouldn’t exist yet, and a sneaky visit to some caves under the Giza Plateau that are now bricked up forever. Hugh also made a case that the Sphinx might not be a lion, it might be a leopard. And he’s got the evidence to back it up. Oh, we also get into everyone’s favorite subject, giants.

HECKLEFISH: Yeah, everyone except the Smithsonian.

AJ GENTILE: That’s true. And we get into that. This one covers a lot of ground. And honestly, the math alone is worth the ride. Yes, math. Let’s go down to the basement. Hugh, welcome to the basement.

HUGH NEWMAN: Thanks for having me on. I really appreciate it.

The Megalithomania Conference: 20 Years of Open Inquiry

AJ GENTILE: How did you go to creating the conference? It’s still running, right?

HUGH NEWMAN: Yeah, for sure. Actually, this is our 20th anniversary. So we like having a bit of a celebration this year. This is the Megalithomania Conference. This is what we’ve been doing since May 2006. I founded this with John Martineau, who’s also my publisher with Wooden Books, and Gareth Mills. I pretty much run it myself with my own team now.

It was really set up, and it’s quite intriguing when you look at what’s going on online nowadays. It was set up as a forum, like a public forum, to have the alternative historical information and researchers with the academics, all on the same stage, but in a very kind way.

AJ GENTILE: Right.

HUGH NEWMAN: Connecting with each other.

AJ GENTILE: Not a debunking, no debate.

HUGH NEWMAN: No, no. It was just a respectful way so we could have a multidisciplinary look at megaliths, ancient sites, the ancient mysteries, and have it as an open forum. We now have top archaeologists and top historians and anthropologists coming along next to people who are talking about what they deem as fringe or out-there stuff. And it’s actually quite fun. A lot of the academics know each other, so one or two of them came along, had such a good time, they actually recommended it. So it’s easy to get some really cool academics to come along.

AJ GENTILE: Like, how was that? Was he cool? And it’s like, “No, it’s great.”

HUGH NEWMAN: No, no. And they’re very — there’s no, we don’t — it’s not like online, the whole Flint Dibble, Graham Hancock thing. There’s all this big nasty kind of back and forth and we just don’t have that. We’re very, very nice, very polite, very respectful. And it works brilliantly. And we’ve stuck to that fun focus every year for the last 20 years.

The Case for Multidisciplinary Archaeology

AJ GENTILE: I’m glad you said multidisciplinary, because what I like about your research is you bring in acoustic engineers, electromagnetic research, all that stuff. I think that’s missing in archaeology.

HUGH NEWMAN: I think you’re right. This is one of the things that kind of bothers me a little bit, and a lot of other researchers. Archaeologists do brilliant work, don’t get me wrong. They are very well trained in preserving, digging up, analyzing these sites, dating them, and everything else. But when it comes to things like astronomy, acoustics, mythology, symbolism, even subtle energies and things like this, it’s not something they’re interested in or trained in. And I think this is where the problem lies in interpreting these sites and having a voice about these sites.

Because you need to have this multidisciplinary look at them. These people back then, they’re the same brain capacity as us. They may have been smarter than us.

AJ GENTILE: Sure.

HUGH NEWMAN: We don’t know. And so they were obviously into lots of interesting things. I mean, you just look at the symbolism at sites like Gobekli Tepe, abstract art and the creation of these sites. It’s insane. It’s just, wow. It’s like these guys were just like master artists as well as being master builders.

And so I think you really need to approach it from all these different angles. I’m not saying I’m a specialist in all these different things, but when you put it on a conference, it’s great. You can invite people to come and you can actually share research. “Would you mind looking at this? I want you to check this out.” You can present it and they can go, “Oh, that’s interesting. I didn’t realize that astronomical alignment was there.