Skip to content
Home » CalAmp Q2 2015 Results Earnings Call Transcript » Page 3

CalAmp Q2 2015 Results Earnings Call Transcript

Howard Smith – Analyst, First Analysis Securities

And on Caterpillar, or your heavy equipment OEM, if it’s going to be more than $10 million in the second half, so you have raised your expectations there. Does that alter the run rate and the annual expectation, or is it just a matter of the pace of the ramp in the second half?

Michael Burdiek: That’s a great question. And I am not sure we can answer that question with a great deal of certainty. We definitely see the program coming on stronger than we anticipated. And I think qualitatively, it’s our belief that going into next year the program is probably going to be a little bit bigger than we initially expected. So obviously it has to play out here over the next couple of quarters and we have to see where we settle in, in terms of the typical quarterly run rate. And we are nowhere close to being at that state yet obviously.

Operator: Thank you. The next question is from Mike Crawford of B. Riley.

Mike Crawford – Analyst, B. Riley

Michael, just to extend that on Caterpillar, your expectations now for a unit attach rate, is that something where you think one of your cellular or satellite routers will be attached to maybe two-thirds of all new pieces of heavy equipment from Caterpillar or is it too hard to say?

Michael Burdiek: It’s a little bit difficult to say at this point, but I think our expectation is that the attach rates are going to be pretty high right out of the gate. We have talked historically about roughly 150,000 units a year addressable market. It’s our view that we can get closer to very, very high rates of penetration vis-à-vis that addressable market earlier than we originally expected.

Mike Crawford – Analyst, B. Riley

Regarding some of the international MRM business, the fleet tracking asset management, who would be some of your top customers, maybe Sascar? Would that be one of the top ones?

Michael Burdiek: Well, as we have talked about in the past, our strategy has been to try to penetrate some of these larger developed international markets by first attacking some of the larger players in each of those regions. Obviously Sascar is a big player in Brazil. So they have been obviously a key focus area for us from an account development standpoint. We have talked about Masternaut in the UK and Europe. Obviously we have made some progress there. And in Q2, we made some excellent progress with one of the larger players in South Africa.

Mike Crawford – Analyst, B. Riley

And then, with your – for the fleet management product, your new tablets, is this something where you are going to be able to offer your own Software-as-a-Service on this platform? Or are you expecting other people to be developing apps that are then sold through your store? How is that going to play out?

Michael Burdiek: Actually, both. Initially, we would expect to be bringing in or bringing through our Appstore some third-party content providers. But we think that there is opportunities for us to also essentially license SaaS applications through our Appstore that would run and operate on the MDT tablet platform.

ALSO READ:  On Purpose Podcast: w/ Financial Educator Jaspreet Singh (Transcript)

Mike Crawford – Analyst, B. Riley

And last question just relates to your new architecture overall. I think you have taken maybe some of the best parts of COLT and some of the best parts of Wireless Matrix and now is that all blending into one common platform now?

Michael Burdiek: More or less, yes. And we talked about a couple of Platform-as-a-Service opportunities getting off the ground in Q2. Both of those opportunities we’re going to be operating on what we term the new CalAmp Connect platform. So for those newer greenfield opportunities, we will be launching them on the new integrated platform.

Operator: Thank you. The next question is from Tim Quillen of Stephens.

Tim Quillen – Analyst, Stephens

Michael, on the previous earnings call three months ago, when discussing the earnings outlook for the year, you had suggested from a conservative to an optimistic view would range from something like 20% to 30% year-over-year growth and I think that the guidance now is 15% to 22% and obviously that bracket is up where analyst estimates already were. So that was good, but what is the change that you have seen to go from that 20% to 30% level down to a 15% to 22% level?

Michael Burdiek: Well, obviously our visibility has increased as we worked our way through the year. We don’t see the satellite business getting back to that sort of $10 million a quarter run rate. It’s going to be hovering between $8 million and $9 million likely this quarter and next as well, probably closer to $8 million than $9 million. So that’s obviously been a very, very solid profit contributor at a time margin profile was realized over the last couple of quarters. So there has been no upside opportunity appear on the scene from satellite’s perspective.

And obviously there’s still a little bit of uncertainty as to exactly how strong Cat will be in the second half of the year, although it’s going to be stronger than we earlier projected in the first couple of quarters this year. And there’s still some potential upside but I think, for us, as we sit here today, I think where we centered guidance for the full year is an appropriate sort of setting of expectations.

Tim Quillen – Analyst, Stephens

And on Caterpillar, I think last quarter, when you were talking about a $10 million type contribution, you suggested that two-thirds or roughly two-thirds would come in 4Q and one-third in 3Q. Is your third quarter outlook the same right now, but there is some upside to the fourth quarter outlook? Is that the right way to think about it?

Michael Burdiek: I know on the last call we talked about Q3 being approximately 30% to 40% of our full year outlook and the last quarter being the balance of that, 60% to 70%.

Pages: 1 2 3 4