Skip to content
Home » Love The Lord Your God With All Your Mind: R.C. Sproul Sermon (Transcript)

Love The Lord Your God With All Your Mind: R.C. Sproul Sermon (Transcript)

Full text of R.C. Sproul’s sermon titled “Love The Lord Your God With All Your Mind” which was delivered at the 2012 National Conference.

Listen to the MP3 Audio here:

TRANSCRIPT:

R.C. Sproul – Founder of Ligonier Ministries

I remember several years ago being invited to speak at a college to the atheist club, and why they asked me I’ll never know. But in any case on that occasion, I said before I give my address here where I’m going to try to answer the intellectual questions and issues that atheism characteristically raises against theism, I want to put my cards clearly on the table so you’ll know where I’m coming from, so you’ll know I’m not trying to fool you in anyway.

But at the outset, let me say to you that though you say you do not believe in God, and you want me to give a compelling argument for His existence, I know going into this discussion that in fact, you already know that God exists and that your problem with the existence of God in the final analysis is not an intellectual problem; it’s a moral one.

Your problem is not that you don’t know that God exists. Your problem is you can’t stand the God whom you know exists.

Well, I gave that speech before I read Dale Carnegie’s How to Win Friends and Influence People. But I was telling them what the New Testament says: that because of their hostility in their corrupt condition to the things of God, that by nature we do everything we can to suppress and repress whatever revelation God gives of Himself to us. And that is not without consequences.

It says here in Romans 1:19, For what can be known about God is plain, because God has shown it to them,” so that the creature on the judgment day cannot plead that if the student didn’t learn, the teacher didn’t teach, because the teacher in this case is the perfect omniscient God. And if the student fails to get the message from this pedagogue, there is no excuse, for he says, “His invisible attributes and even His eternal power and divine nature have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world. So they are without excuse.” (Romans 1:20)

Now here’s the crux of the matter.

Romans 1:21-24: “Although they knew God, they did not honor Him as God or give thanks to Him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened. They claimed to be wise, but they became fools, so foolish as to exchange the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal men, birds, animals, creeping things. And for this reason, God gave them over to their wicked inclinations.”

And in Romans 1:28, Since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up.”

What a horrible judgment! What a terrible thing that God would give you up! And He gives us up to a reprobate mind, to a mind that now in its fallen condition doesn’t have a scintilla of desire to love God with the mind.

In other words, dear friends, in our natural fallen condition, there is nothing more repugnant to our minds than the love of God. So that when the great commandment sounds in our ears that we are to love God with all of our minds, we have such an antipathy by nature, such an allergy to such an idea that we choke at the very thought of it.

We wonder why it is that there are some people in the history of the world who have manifested such brilliance and intelligence, yet end their journey in a militant atheism. We say, “How can that be when God’s revelation of Himself is so plain, is so clear?

[read more]

Poneros is the Greek. Manifestum is the Latin. That the knowledge that God gives of Himself is not vague. It’s not obscure. It’s so clear that everybody gets it. And yet you see people like Jean-Paul Sartre, who is evidence of such brilliance, men like the philosophers of the ages, Feuerbach, Marx, others, Kaufmann, who in all other degrees manifest such brilliance that they miss this fundamental truth.

Now, How Does That Relate To This Noetic Effect?

In the damage that is done to the mind in our fallen condition, it does not mean that our ability to think has been annihilated. Pagan thinkers can still add two and two and come up to four. Pagan thinkers can still reason soundly with a syllogism and can spot errors of logic without any help of being born-again.

You don’t have to be regenerate in order to get a PhD in mathematics. The mind in its fallen condition still has the ability to follow formal argumentation to a degree, and that degree ends when the discussion begins about the character of God, because that is where bias is so severe and hostility so great that the most brilliant of men stumble before it.

ALSO READ:  Billy Graham on Conscience (Full Transcript)

I’ve said in the past that in fact if a person begins the pattern of their thinking at the outset by refusing to acknowledge what they know to be true, that is by starting with the rejection of the knowledge of God, the more brilliant they are thereafter and the more consistent they are thereafter, the further away from God their reasoning will lead them.

Again, it’s not because their faculty of thinking has been extinguished. They can still reason, and they can still argue, and they can argue consistently. But again, if their beginning premise is a denial of what they know to be true and a refusal to acknowledge what they already know, it is no wonder that their conclusions lead them to become shepherds of death.

All right, if this is our natural condition, what is the first of all the relationship between rationality, between thinking and faith?

The late great Augustine made the comment that there is a symbiotic relationship between faith and reason, one that is so important that if you try to have faith without reason, the faith that you will display will not be authentic biblical faith, because a faith without reason, Augustine said, is not faith but credulity.

It’s the kind of silliness that affirms that belief in the existence of little green men who live on the other side of the moon whose nonexistence as a negative can never be proven.