Skip to content
Home » Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: The Global Cost of MAGA Politics (Transcript)

Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: The Global Cost of MAGA Politics (Transcript)

Editor’s Notes: In this episode of Judging Freedom, Judge Andrew Napolitano welcomes Professor Jeffrey Sachs to discuss the profound geopolitical implications of “America First” policies and recent escalations regarding Iran. Professor Sachs argues that current administration strategies are less about true national interest and more about a continuation of long-standing, interventionist traditions influenced by external lobbies and “swamp” politics. They examine the humanitarian and economic toll of these conflicts, the role of international voices in urging restraint, and the potential domestic fallout for the average American. This conversation provides a critical look at the “global cost” of these political shifts and the urgent need for transparency and diplomacy to avoid catastrophic outcomes. (Feb 3, 2026)

TRANSCRIPT:

“Undeclared wars are commonplace. Tragically, our government engages in preemptive war, otherwise known as aggression, with no complaints from the American people. Sadly, we have become accustomed to living with the illegitimate use of force by government. To develop a truly free society, the issue of initiating force must be understood. Reject it.”

Opening Remarks

JUDGE ANDREW NAPOLITANO: What if sometimes to love your country you had to alter or abolish the government? What if Jefferson was right? What if that government is best which governs least? What if it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong? What if it is better to perish fighting for freedom than to live as a slave? What if freedom’s greatest hour of danger is now?

Hi everyone. Judge Andrew Napolitano here for Judging Freedom. Today is Tuesday, February 3, 2026. Professor Jeffrey Sachs will be with us in just a moment. How did America first come to mean destroying other countries?

Professor Sachs, welcome here, my dear friend. Thank you for accommodating our schedule. How did America first come to mean destroying other countries?

The Continuation of Interventionist Tradition

PROFESSOR JEFFREY SACHS: Well, the destruction of other countries is a long-standing American tradition. It’s just that Trump hasn’t changed anything and in recent months he’s become rather unhinged, I would say. So America first didn’t invent anything and it didn’t change anything.

The U.S. has been engaged in wars of choice, especially Israel’s wars of choice and in regime change operations for decades. The CIA has been the most important powerful agent of the U.S. Government. It has been a disaster time and again in my view.

One of the reasons why it gets away with disaster is that it’s basically unaccountable. It just walks away from one disaster after another without anybody scrutinizing the CIA. CIA hasn’t had a proper overview by the public and Congress since 1975, more than 50 years ago in the Church committee.

So what’s happening is just a continuation of our politics. It’s alarming. It’s been a massive failure. It continues to be a massive failure. It’s very heavily driven by the Zionist lobby when it comes to the Middle East. And we’re on the verge of war with Iran because of all of this. And that could be another devastating mistake.

JUDGE ANDREW NAPOLITANO: What do you think Trump’s strategy is? Or that’s the wrong word. What do you think Trump’s—

PROFESSOR JEFFREY SACHS: Call a sentence that says Trump strategy is the wrong phrase.

JUDGE ANDREW NAPOLITANO: Right?

PROFESSOR JEFFREY SACHS: Right. There is no strategy.

JUDGE ANDREW NAPOLITANO: Oxymoronic.

PROFESSOR JEFFREY SACHS: It’s improvisation.

JUDGE ANDREW NAPOLITANO: But is it whatever Netanyahu wants? Is it the destruction and breakup of Iran?

Netanyahu’s Long-Standing Agenda

PROFESSOR JEFFREY SACHS: Of course, the goal of Netanyahu, not exactly a secret, going back 30 years. And it’s exactly 30 years to 1996 when Netanyahu and his American and Israeli political advisors brought out a document that should be better understood and known called “Clean Break,” which is a document essentially calling for Israeli hegemony over the Middle East, overthrowing any government that opposes Israel’s control over the Palestinians.

The goal from the start was the mother lode from the start was overthrowing the Iranian government. And of course, the U.S. has been party to one covert operation after another. Assassinations, economic warfare, and last summer in June, the direct bombing of Iran.

Remember how Trump chortled after the bombing that, “Well, this ended Iran’s nuclear program.” Now we hear, “Well, we have to go to war because there’s a nuclear program.” This is typical Trump nonsense in all directions. There’s no consistency at all.

But the one consistent point is that Netanyahu has been urging the United States to go to war with a powerful country with a lot of powerful friends in the most explosive region of the world. And that urging has been going on basically since the mid-1990s. And every year of that period, Netanyahu said Iran’s about to get a nuclear bomb. That’s been the non-stop pattern.

The truth is that for the last dozen years, intensively, Iran has been trying to negotiate with the United States, and indeed it did negotiate with the United States. And it reached an agreement with the entire permanent five countries of the Security Council plus Germany in a program that would absolutely have controlled Iran’s nuclear energy to ensure that it could not be diverted into nuclear weapons.

That was agreed. It was voted unanimously by the UN Security Council Resolution 2231 in 2015. And Trump ripped it up when he came into office in the first term because Netanyahu told him to rip it up.

So here we are. Trump says, “You got to negotiate.” They have negotiated. Last year, when they negotiated, he bombed them. So this is a really dark, dangerous, stupid, typically stupid game of the Israelis, and Trump is their agent. There’s no space between what Netanyahu wants and what Trump delivers.

ALSO READ:  Joe Rogan Experience: #1169 with Elon Musk (Transcript)

The Threat of Iranian Retaliation

JUDGE ANDREW NAPOLITANO: Is Netanyahu fearful of an Iranian attack on Israel in response to an American attack on Iran? And if he is, is that a realistic fear?

PROFESSOR JEFFREY SACHS: Well, he should be afraid, of course, but he’s counting on the United States to go all in. So he’s counting on a full-fledged war that would knock out Iran.