Skip to content
Home » The Masculinity Crisis and How To Solve It – Nick Freitas on TRIGGERnometry (Transcript)

The Masculinity Crisis and How To Solve It – Nick Freitas on TRIGGERnometry (Transcript)

Here is the full transcript of American Republican politician Nick Freitas’ interview on TRIGGERnometry Podcast with hosts Konstantin Kisin and Francis Foster, December 4, 2025.

TRIGGERnometry hosts Konstantin Kisin and Francis Foster sit down with Green Beret veteran and politician Nick Freitas to dig into what he calls a growing crisis of masculinity in the modern West. Freitas explains why demonizing men, sidelining fathers, and feminizing key institutions have left young men alienated, angry, and vulnerable to destructive role models. Drawing on his experience as a soldier, father, and podcast host, he argues that male aggression and strength must be trained, disciplined, and put in service of family, faith, and community. The conversation explores practical ways young men can build character, find purpose, and become dangerous in defense of what they love rather than a threat to it.

Welcome Back

KONSTANTIN KISIN: Nick Freitas, welcome back to the show.

NICK FREITAS: Great to be back.

KONSTANTIN KISIN: It’s awesome to have you on. We were sitting here about a year ago, I think, or something like that, in this exact same room and as it turns out, actually in the exact same clothes. We had an amazing conversation about your life, military service, combat, the war in Gaza, obviously. And then we did our usual question: What’s the one thing you’re not talking about?

And paraphrasing, you basically said, “If you keep demonizing young men and behaving towards them in ways that are unconstructive, good men—I hope that includes the three of us—are not actually going to be able to control what comes after that.”

I think you were kind of right.

The Revolt of Young Men

NICK FREITAS: Yeah. No, I think if I remember right, it was like, young men are going to revolt and that doesn’t mean they’re going to revolt in the way you want them to. It’s not going to be woke because I think some elements of the left have finally figured out that you probably are not going to win the revolution or seize the means of production with a bunch of mentally ill people who prioritize their mental health issues as their primary identity.

You’re certainly not going to do that if you have to fight a whole generation of young men that you have systematically alienated for two decades. But again, the hope is that good men or that young men revolt in a direction that says, “I’m going to reject this aspect of toxic masculinity. I’m going to reject the feminization of men. I’m going to reject all these other things, and then I’m going to choose to be a good, strong, competent, masculine man who is also noble and honorable and fighting for things that are not just within my own interest, but that are true.”

But that’s not the only option. There’s other options out there. The other options are “I’m just going to punish everyone that decided to treat me this way. And so I’m going to be strong, capable, and competent so I can get what I want and screw those people.”

And those are the two paths before young men right now. And again, we’re still not sure which one is going to actually get a critical mass. But I’m a lot more encouraged now that I see a lot more people fighting for what I think is the right path.

Charlie Kirk’s Legacy

KONSTANTIN KISIN: And of course, I think one of the reasons that the reaction to the horrific assassination of Charlie Kirk was so strong was that he was doing that for young people. He was leading them towards God, towards family, towards children, towards service. He’s going to be a huge loss going forward.

NICK FREITAS: He is. The thing that I’m very grateful for with Charlie is Charlie wasn’t the sort of guy to just advocate for these things. Charlie was the sort of guy to create other people that would come in his footsteps or behind him. And so he did develop a network in order to do that.

And it’s amazing the amount of young men, and not just young men too, like families that were saying, “Hey, I’m going to church for the first time. I bought a Bible for the first time.” So Charlie really did do a good job of not just pointing to the political philosophy, but actually pointing to the transcendent, which I think is essential.

I have a hard time believing that any sort of political philosophy is going to be ultimately successful, completely removed from any sort of transcendent principles of objective truth and morality.

Unfortunately, we’re already seeing, though, without Charlie’s presence, we’re already starting to see fractures within the right on that. And that’s unfortunate because I felt like we had this moment in time and we haven’t lost it yet. I want to be clear on that. It’s not like it’s a lost opportunity.

But I don’t think we should be shocked by the fact that whenever you see unity around something, there’s always going to be a lot of money to be made and a lot of strategy to be had in dividing it up.

The Absence of Fathers

FRANCIS FOSTER: And one of the things when we talk about this conversation I don’t think we focus enough on is positive male role models, but also fathers. I think one of the major reasons why we see these young lads and young boys in crisis, because that’s what it is, is a complete absence of father figures or positive male role models.

NICK FREITAS: I mean, look, this was being talked about in the 1960s in the United States. And every single demographic within the United States has had an increase in fatherlessness. It’s been the least prominent within Asian communities, but every single one of them has seen a significant increase.

And the bottom line is that men, boys are looking for structure. They’re looking for hierarchy. They’re looking for someone to train them up and what they should do and to find their role and place within society.