Skip to content
Home » Transcript of How A Xerox Machine Saved Lives And Won Me A Nobel Prize – Drew Weissman

Transcript of How A Xerox Machine Saved Lives And Won Me A Nobel Prize – Drew Weissman

Here is the full transcript of immunologist Drew Weissman’s talk titled “How A Xerox Machine Saved Lives And Won Me A Nobel Prize” at TEDxPenn 2025 conference.

Listen to the audio version here:

DREW WEISSMAN: Thank you very much. It’s an honor to be here. So, I can honestly say I am the only Nobel Laureate who has ever thanked a photocopying machine in their Nobel speech. You young folks can ask the older folks what a photocopy machine is.

A Chance Meeting at the Copy Machine

Kati Kariko and I started working together in 1997. That’s when I came to Penn from the National Institutes of Health from Tony Fauci’s lab. You’ve probably heard of him and a few other things. So, when I came over, Kati and I, the only way you could read a journal article back then was to photocopy it. So, we would wait for each other and talk. And mostly Kati talked and I got a few words in here and there. But we talked about our interests and what we were doing and what we wanted to work on.

Kati worked on RNA and she would deliver RNA to any kind of cells, any kind of cell line and ask, is protein made? I had worked in HIV pathogenesis and I worked on dendritic cells. So, I’m not going to overwhelm you with science, but dendritic cells are the cell that starts all immune reactions. And what that means is that dendritic cells are the critical cell for making a vaccine.

So, my interest was, I wanted to get mRNA to load dendritic cells. And here I am bumping into somebody at a copy machine who makes RNA and gives it the cells. It was a serendipitous moment. Again, you’ll have to ask an older person what that means. But we started working together and we spent eight years fighting our way in the lab, figuring out what was going on and how do we get RNA to work better. And that led us to our paper in 2005 that allowed us to identify a critical change that was needed in mRNA to get it to work better.

When Everyone Else Gave Up

So, if you look back in the late 90s, many people, many labs, many pharmaceutical companies were working with RNA. It went into clinical trials, it went into people trials and it failed. Everybody at that point in time gave up on it. They said it’s too hard to work with, it’s too fragile, it’s too difficult, it doesn’t make enough protein, it doesn’t work. And they gave up on it. And that was it. RNA was dead.

So, when Kati and I investigated this, we found that we could modify the RNA and make it more stable, make it produce much more protein. And that’s what went into the first two COVID vaccines that were approved and helped to stem the tide of the pandemic.

This is just a calculation of what effect the vaccines had on the COVID-19 pandemic. And what it’s noting is both the up and down nature of the pandemic, but importantly, once vaccines were introduced, the number of deaths from COVID-19 greatly dropped by enormous amounts. It’s been calculated the vaccine saved between 15 and 20 million lives.

So, Kati and I spent 25 years working on mRNA, trying to turn it into something useful. And it finally became useful in a vaccine. Now, neither of us thinking back from 1997, when we first met, ever thought that the vaccine would be proven in a century pandemic of the entire world. But that’s life.

Overcoming Disbelief

Looking back, and many of the people that have spoke before me talk about the roadblocks to getting to where we are nowadays. The roadblocks that Kati and I ran into were disbelief. So, we would submit papers to journals and they wouldn’t publish them because they said, nobody cares about RNA. We would submit grants and we would get them back and they would say, we’re not going to fund RNA. It’ll never work. Why bother?

ALSO READ:  David JP Phillips: The Magical Science of Storytelling (Transcript)

I would go to meetings and I’m an HIV researcher. So, I would go to HIV meetings where I would meet and talk with friends, mentors, and I would tell them about the work we were doing with RNA. They would sit there and they would smile and they would nod and they would often finish by saying, “Drew, you know, you really should give up on RNA. You’re wasting your time. It’s never going to be a useful therapeutic. Nobody cares about it. Why don’t you do something useful with your career?” And I would try not to get upset and try not to fight back with them. But here we are nowadays. It’s now RNA is a well-accepted therapeutic in most people’s minds and we can talk about that later.

The Vast Potential of mRNA

I always look forward when I think about new research, new therapeutics, new treatments for people. RNA is not just a COVID-19 vaccine. It has enormous potential for unmeasurable number of diseases. This is a very short list of everything that it could potentially be used for. The list goes on and on. But this covers just about every medical problem you can think of from cancer to infectious diseases, autoimmunity, immunotherapy, heart disease, neurodegeneration. The list goes on and on. The potential for RNA is really enormous.

Revolutionizing CAR-T Cell Therapy

One of the things that we’re very interested in, CAR-T cells were clinically developed at Penn. The first two were developed at Penn and FDA licensed. What a CAR-T cell is, it’s a way of priming our immune systems to kill cancer. So in the old days, we would give chemotherapy, which are agents that break DNA, that damage DNA. And the hope is you damage the DNA of the cancer faster than you do your normal cells. But everybody who gets chemotherapy gets sick because it doesn’t really work that well.