Skip to content
Home » Transcript of John Kiriakou’s Interview: This Past Weekend #661

Transcript of John Kiriakou’s Interview: This Past Weekend #661

Editor’s Note: In this episode of This Past Weekend, Theo Von sits down with former CIA officer and whistleblower John Kiriakou for a fascinating conversation about his career in intelligence and his life after the agency. Kiriakou shares gripping stories from his time serving in the CIA, ranging from his experience as a leadership analyst to the intensity of his field operations. (June 5, 2026)

TRANSCRIPT:

Introduction

THEO VON: Today’s guest is an author, he’s a speaker, he’s a former CIA officer who’s also known for being a whistleblower in the CIA’s use of torture. He has a new book coming out called The Ultimate Guide to CIA Skills, Tactics, and Techniques. Today’s guest is Mr. John Kiriakou.

Presidential Pardon and Tulsi Gabbard

JOHN KIRIAKOU: Yeah, I applied for a presidential pardon.

THEO VON: You applied for a presidential pardon?

JOHN KIRIAKOU: Yeah. Yeah. In fact, I brought a couple of letters. I hope you don’t—

THEO VON: As long as you don’t meet me. If I sign them, it’s not going to help anything.

JOHN KIRIAKOU: I’m telling you that. Oh, okay. I was going to ask if you thought it would be helpful. I got—

THEO VON: Did you really?

JOHN KIRIAKOU: Oh yeah.

THEO VON: Oh, okay. Dang, I was joking.

JOHN KIRIAKOU: Oh no, no, no. I’m talking to Tulsi Gabbard on Friday. Did I tell you that?

THEO VON: Oh nice. Her husband just went into surgery today, I saw. Yeah. I messaged with her yesterday.

JOHN KIRIAKOU: She’s great.

THEO VON: Yeah, Tulsi Gabbard, she seems— there’s just something about her that seems genuine to me.

JOHN KIRIAKOU: And that’s why they tried to destroy her.

THEO VON: Is that what you think is going on with her right now?

JOHN KIRIAKOU: That’s why the Democrats tried to destroy her. I really do.

THEO VON: But even right now, I mean, she’s just taken a leave. I know it’s for her husband’s health.

JOHN KIRIAKOU: Yeah. Oh yeah. Headed into surgery this morning.

THEO VON: Oh, is that what it says?

JOHN KIRIAKOU: Yeah, she tweeted or she Instagrammed it.

THEO VON: Yeah. Yeah. Do you think— because she’s kind of like— and she just took a break. She took a complete break from politics.

JOHN KIRIAKOU: Yeah. You remember when she was running as a Democrat, every time she would inch up in the polls, the DNC would change the rules for participating in the next debate. So they would do it just 1 or 2 percentage points out of her reach every single time. Because they were threatened by her message. She just wouldn’t get with their program.

THEO VON: She’s always seemed very— like she has her own—

JOHN KIRIAKOU: Oh, she was definitely independent.

THEO VON: Independent. That’s what it is. She’s always seemed very independent. Well, they did the same thing with Bernie Sanders.

JOHN KIRIAKOU: They did exactly the same thing with Bernie Sanders.

Superdelegates and the Democratic Party

THEO VON: So I guess what my question would be— and I probably— I don’t know, I can’t remember if I asked Bernie this or not, but why would you stay in a party that you know at a certain point is not— that’s cheating you?

JOHN KIRIAKOU: Yes. And the Democrats did something after the 1972 election, which I think people don’t pay anywhere near enough attention to. Nobody at the DNC wanted George McGovern to be the 1972 nominee. He was the most popular at the time, especially among young people. But he was the weakest nationwide, and he ended up losing 49 states. But it’s a party of the people, right? If the people want George McGovern as the nominee, then George McGovern should be the nominee.

THEO VON: And they didn’t let him become the nominee.

JOHN KIRIAKOU: They let him become the nominee, and then as soon as he lost the race, they instituted this thing called superdelegates. So if you are a member of the House, member of the Senate, a governor, a lieutenant governor, a state party director, state committee chairman, you’re automatically made a delegate to the convention. Well, there are like 1,500 of them. And so you end up with situations like West Virginia and Wyoming where Bernie Sanders beats Hillary Clinton in both states, and Hillary Clinton wins literally every delegate from those states. Like, how’s that fair?

THEO VON: So wait, explain that to me a little bit better, ’cause I want to get on this. George McGovern was a major reason Democrats later created superdelegates. After McGovern’s 1972 nomination and landslide general election loss, party leaders wanted a way to give more influence to experienced officials and reduce the chance that a highly activist primary electorate would produce another nominee they saw as too extreme. So you’re saying the people believed in this guy? Oh yeah. Even though he lost, the people believed in him, but the party and whoever that is didn’t want it to be like just a populist vote. They didn’t want just the people to have the choice.

JOHN KIRIAKOU: They wanted to go back to the days with the smoke-filled back rooms, with the party bosses choosing who’s going to be the nominee.

THEO VON: And if they put more on the shoulders of just the delegates, the superdelegates, then they could control fewer. It was fewer people they had to control.

JOHN KIRIAKOU: Exactly.

George McGovern’s 1984 Campaign Announcement

THEO VON: Wow. Exactly.

JOHN KIRIAKOU: I am proud to say, in 1983, I was a sophomore in college. I was the speakers committee chairman. I was the whole committee of the George Washington University College Democrats in the days when I was a Democrat. And I saw a little blurb in the Washington Post saying, “Hey, remember George McGovern? He’s thinking of running for president again.” So I wrote him a letter.