Skip to content
Home » Scott Ritter: Iran War Reignites as U.S. Pushes to Reopen the Strait of Hormuz (Transcript)

Scott Ritter: Iran War Reignites as U.S. Pushes to Reopen the Strait of Hormuz (Transcript)

Editor’s Notes: In this episode, Glenn Diesen is joined by former UN weapons inspector Scott Ritter to analyze the sudden and dangerous reignition of conflict between the U.S. and Iran following a surprise move to forcefully reopen the Strait of Hormuz. Ritter provides a scathing assessment of American strategic failures, arguing that the administration’s “fantasy” policies have led to military humiliation and shattered any hope for regional stability. The discussion explores the existential risks facing Gulf Arab states and the potential for a global economic collapse as the U.S. doubles down on its failed objectives. Together, they examine the profound disconnect between Washington’s rhetoric and the harsh realities of a war that Ritter believes the U.S. is destined to lose. (May 4, 2026) 

TRANSCRIPT:

Introduction

GLENN DIESEN: Welcome back. Today is Monday, May 4th, 2026, and we are joined by Scott Ritter, a former UN weapons inspector and a former US Marine Corps intelligence officer. Thank you for coming back on. It’s been a crazy day. We see that the US announced it would open up the Strait of Hormuz. It would be done today by force in something of a surprise announcement, and we received some reports then of American warships being hit. They appear to have been mistaken. But at least now it seems that the US is attacking Iranian gunboats and Iran is, well, launching a lot of drones and missiles. Beyond this, it’s still unclear what’s happening. Are we heading towards returning at least to all-out war? How are you reading the situation?

The Current State of Conflict

SCOTT RITTER: Well, clearly the United States is not opening the Strait of Hormuz. I mean, I’ve read the various press releases, two American warships are operating in the Arabian Gulf and two US-flagged container ships have transited. I don’t know if this is true. The United States has a proclivity for lying or shading the truth. What we do know is that ships that have tried to transit have been struck by the Iranians. We know that the Iranians are likewise striking targets in the United Arab Emirates and that the United States has claimed to sink, who have sunk at least 6 small Iranian boats.

It’s war. I mean, I don’t know how else to describe this, a skirmish, opening battle. But the ceasefire is over. And whether it escalates beyond this, we will wait and see. Bahrain has declared a state of emergency. I think Kuwait is on the cusp of declaring a state of emergency. I think the Gulf Arab states understand that the consequences of America’s precipitous action could be fatal to them. Not harmful, fatal to them.

Iran has warned the United States using indirect communication methodologies, or actually going to Moscow and Vladimir Putin making a 1.5-hour phone call to Donald Trump in which, according to the readout from Ushakov, made it clear that the consequences of continued American military action against Iran would be devastating for the United States, for the region, for everybody.

Right now, I do think this is a containable event, but it’s going to require the United States to back down. And if the United States backs down at this junction, then the United Arab Emirates, which has undertaken extreme strategic reposturing in the past week — it’s now come out that Israel sent air defense missiles to the United Arab Emirates, including troops, Israeli troops operating on Arab soil. Mind-boggling. Which means that the United Arab Emirates has made a strategic decision to step away from the Gulf Arab community and permanently link itself to the Abraham Accords, to the greater Israeli project.

This is a heck of a gamble that they’re making because it’s one that they can’t recover from. Either they win, the United States defeats — because this Israeli-UAE dream partnership can only succeed if Iran is strategically defeated. So the United Arab Emirates now is in an existential struggle. They can’t accept half measures. A lot of decisions have been made for which there is no going back. And now the question is, will the United States make a similar decision? Hopefully the answer is no. Hopefully we find a way to de-escalate, but I don’t think that’s in Donald Trump’s DNA at this point in time.

What Are the U.S. Objectives?

GLENN DIESEN: Well, it begs the question what the objectives are, because again, I agree it can still be contained if they walk this one back and the US can even use it as a, you know, for PR, trying to present it as Iran being the aggressive part. But what do you think are the objectives here for the United States? Is it to — because I can see that they might want to try to push through and, you know, probe, see if Iran would allow ships to go through if they’re being threatened. But it should be obvious, as you would know as well as an intelligence officer, you know the people who are there in the US, these are smart people. They would know that the Iranians would not permit this. Indeed, if they let some ships go through, it might even embolden the Europeans to join in with the Americans. Why do you think the US went forward with this? I mean, what are the objectives?

Israeli Influence and Policy Failures

SCOTT RITTER: Well, you say that Trump has surrounded himself with smart people. I say the opposite. Trump has surrounded himself with some of the stupidest people on the planet. There might be smart people on the periphery, but their voices are being drowned out by the stupidity whispered in his ears.

Just take a look at the intellectual foundation of the American policy vis-à-vis Iran in the Persian Gulf region today — it is being run by the Foundation for the Defense of Democracy, which is literally an adjunct of the Israeli Foreign Ministry. In fact, when it was originally founded, it used a Hebrew name because it was an Israeli organization.