Skip to content
Home » Transcript: Nigel Farage at ARC 2026: Family, Energy and the Future of Britain

Transcript: Nigel Farage at ARC 2026: Family, Energy and the Future of Britain

The following is the full transcript of British politician Nigel Farage’s interview at ARC 2026, June 24, 2026.   

Editor’s Note: In this exclusive session at ARC 2026, Nigel Farage discusses his vision for the future of Britain, emphasizing the urgent need to defend Western civilization and the values of family, community, and nationhood. He addresses contemporary challenges, including the impact of mass migration on productivity and the need for a fundamental shift toward energy independence through nuclear power. Additionally, Farage explores the importance of restoring social cohesion and meritocracy, arguing for a more consistent approach to law and order across all communities.  

Defending Western Civilization

PHILIPPA STROUD: Nigel, welcome to ARC. You were here last year as well. We are so grateful for you coming back this year. You have spoken about the importance of this cultural moment, of this civilizational moment. Why do you think we need to defend Western civilization today?

NIGEL FARAGE: Good morning, everybody. I’m amazed to see so many people here. Don’t you know there’s a red warning? We’re in the red zone. The schools have all closed. No one’s going to work. There’s a danger to life. I’m astonished you’re all here.

PHILIPPA STROUD: Oh, proud of a resilient bunch of people.

NIGEL FARAGE: Of course they are. I think that what we developed in Western civilization, the basis of which, of course, is Judeo-Christian culture. That’s undeniable at every level. And the way in which we developed it over centuries to become democratic, where we had the right to choose our leaders, to fire our leaders — I think in terms of the life of ordinary people, has produced the best civilization that humanity has managed in the 2 million years it’s been around. And it seems to me that’s something worth fighting for and worth defending.

And the extent to which Western leaders over the last few decades have lost sight of this, almost don’t care. I mean, it was interesting, wasn’t it? It was Alastair Campbell in the late ’90s, “We don’t do God.” Yeah. “We don’t do God.” And the promotion of every other culture and every other religion to kids at school. But no fundamental teaching of what we are and why what we’ve created has really been so wonderful.

So yeah, I think we’re in real danger. I think we’re in real danger of absolutely losing a sense of who we are. And really, when I came back into politics 2 years ago, having been out for a few years, it was really the values around family, community, country, and that’s why I came back. And I think there is an appetite, there is a thirst for this, and I’m also encouraged that despite the education system, it seems to me growing numbers of Gen Z are looking for a sense of purpose, looking for a sense of why are we here, and what does it mean.

Social Cohesion and Two-Tier Britain

PHILIPPA STROUD: And can I just pick you up on that family and community? Here in the UK, we’ve obviously had the murder of Henry Novak and then the riotings in Belfast as well. Can you just talk us through, in your mind, what is required to re-establish a sense of togetherness, of social cohesion once again?

NIGEL FARAGE: Well, we are living in two-tier Britain. We’ve got two-tier policing, we’ve got two-tier justice. And we’ve had two-tier care, but not for very much longer. Just look at Hampshire and the Isle of Wight. This appalling incident happened in Southampton. Just look at the Hampshire and Isle of Wight Race Action Plan put in place, whereby the most serious thing a police officer can be told is that somebody has committed an act of racial abuse, whether it’s true or not. And if the officer doesn’t take that accusation seriously, they will be suspended immediately.

So we’re not policing each group with colorblindness. We’re not treating everybody the same. And the police chiefs themselves admit we now police different communities and different groups in different ways. This is a road to disaster.

ALSO READ:  Alexis Jones: "Locker Room Talk"? Says Who? at TEDxUniversityofNevada (Transcript)

PHILIPPA STROUD: And what would you be doing to address that and to change that?

NIGEL FARAGE: I would say that we have to treat everybody exactly the same, whether you’re a police officer on the street, whether you’re a university admissions secretary. Everybody must be treated the same. We have to get back to some sense that we’re a meritocracy, because if we don’t, the level of division — and you saw those, I mean, you mentioned the riots. But if that sense of division grows deeper, we’re headed for very, very troubled times.

Strengthening Families

PHILIPPA STROUD: Yeah, and whilst we’re talking about our social fabric, we’re seeing across nations a declining in our demographic trends and also a declining in the resilience of families. You have right at the center of your mantra about Reform, family, community, nation. So when you’re looking at family, what is your approach to strengthening families and enabling them to thrive and flourish?

NIGEL FARAGE: Well, the tax system for years has actually counted against people getting married. It’s actually encouraged people — now look, I may not be the best advocate for marriage myself, track record’s a bit checkered, but I still think it’s a good thing, and there’s no doubt — all the evidence is there that children that are brought up in a married household have better life chances than those that don’t. It’s just as simple as that.

And the tax system has penalized people getting married. So I think there are incentives, there are things that can be done. And I also think that working couples who’ve got young families need some help, some incentive through the tax system to make their lives a little bit easier, and I really do.

PHILIPPA STROUD: So we have 1,000 young leaders here at this conference, and I know from speaking with many young people that it’s not so much about the tax system, it’s actually about something in the culture, something more profound — that they are reticent to go into a marriage setting, a committed relationship.