Skip to content
Home » Transcript: Raymond Moody – Life After Death? – Suncoast In-Depth Podcast

Transcript: Raymond Moody – Life After Death? – Suncoast In-Depth Podcast

Read the full transcript of psychiatrist and philosopher Dr. Raymond Moody’s interview on Suncoast In-Depth Podcast with host pastor Brett Watson, on “Life After Death?”, March 27, 2024.

Introduction to Dr. Raymond Moody

BRETT WATSON: Welcome to Suncoast In-Depth Podcast. My name is Brett Watson and today I am joined by a very special guest and a new friend, Dr. Raymond Moody. Dr. Moody is an MD psychiatrist. He is a philosopher. You have your PhD in philosophy, specifically Greek philosophy.

RAYMOND MOODY: Well, Greek philosophy and analytic philosophy.

BRETT WATSON: Okay.

RAYMOND MOODY: Yeah, and everything. I just love philosophy.

BRETT WATSON: Yeah, yeah. And you said you did a residency in forensic psychology as well.

From Forensic Psychiatry to Comedy

RAYMOND MOODY: Yeah, I was. You know, forensic psychiatry was my favorite thing to do. I just had a situation in life in 1976 when I graduated from medical school. My comedy career was reaching its height and I’d been doing this little stick for years and years and it was getting more and more invitations. So I had to choose whether to become a comedian or a forensic psychiatrist. So I chose murder over laughter.

BRETT WATSON: I guess it’s not a choice too many people have to make, I got to say.

RAYMOND MOODY: It’s like the forensic psychiatry enables you to see some of the weirdest phenomena in the universe. And it’s like people who chop their mother and father up in a meat grinder and stuff. And then you quickly realize that the weirdest ones you deal with are the people who were in the sane state of mind when they committed murder. That’s harder to figure than the people who did it because of delusions.

BRETT WATSON: The sane ones were more creative.

RAYMOND MOODY: Yeah, were just more hard to figure. Except, you know, they all had the same first premise: “I’m smarter than the police.”

BRETT WATSON: That’s how they start out, all of them.

RAYMOND MOODY: That’s how I can figure this out. And they are wrong.

Near-Death Experiences and Life After Life

BRETT WATSON: So that’s fascinating. You’ve had a lot of really wild experiences, but you’re best known for your research into near-death experiences, a term you actually coined, if I’m not mistaken. Your best-selling book was “Life After Life” that was published in ’75. Yeah. I remember my friend Kevin O’Hara. You’ve met him. He said, “I read that book when I was 15 years old.” So I recently read “Proof of the Afterlife” and enjoyed it very much.

RAYMOND MOODY: Thank you.

BRETT WATSON: Yeah, it was great. In fact, because of your—I don’t know if you knew this, but in the Audible version of the book at the end, there’s an excerpt from Rajiv’s and that’s how I got turned onto that one.

So I wanted to talk with you about some of the aspects of “Proof of the Afterlife,” because what I noticed there is that this is—well, I guess the title kind of gives it away. You’re looking at the more objective evidence that comes from these different experiences. And there’s more emphasis, it seems, on what you’re calling SDEs, shared death experiences, because of the more objective nature of it.

So tell us what you mean when you talk about shared death experience. I think a lot of people have the impression that it’s about, “Oh, my friend died and I was there and I experienced his death.” But it’s not just that.

Understanding Shared Death Experiences

RAYMOND MOODY: Well, it’s a very complex thing, Brett, and basically it’s—I was a professor of logic, all right? I first became known for these near-death experiences when I was a professor of philosophy at East Carolina University, because I’d known about it when I was a graduate student, undergraduate student, then I began to talk to people.

And when I was a professor at East Carolina was when I first became known publicly for this subject, because every little civic club in town needs a speaker everywhere. So I was it. And so I became known as the guy who studies this. And ever since then, Brett, there’s been a steady stream of very likable people come up to me and they ask, “Dr. Moody, can we have a proof of life after death?”

And I am embarrassed to say that for years I would compute that. I would go back to logic and I would think, well, Bertrand Russell and Alfred North Whitehead and their Principia, you know, and that Wittgenstein talks about the difficulties of proof. And I mean, and then people would just kind of drift away. And I never really got at what they were getting at.

And I finally kind of realized a few years ago that what people are asking me when they ask that question is not anything to do about logic, as I would understand as a professional logician, but rather that they are asking a simple question and they want to know, “Is it a rational thing to expect and anticipate that when we die that there is a further extension?”

And I say absolutely it is. And I also will say that the reason I’m confident in saying that is that I know that the essential logical problems have been solved. Classically, the logical difficulties with the question of an afterlife were formulated by the great skeptic David Hume, who pointed out that it’s incommensurate with the logic we use, but that has now been solved. There’s a way to think about this that is perfectly rational and logical.

And so I can now say from what I know personally that, yeah, there is an afterlife, folks, and I am a skeptic in the real sense. You know, the skeptical movement was formulated by Pyrrho, who was a Greek philosopher around the, just shortly after the death of Aristotle.