Skip to content
Home » How to Treat Men Better – Alison Armstrong on Modern Wisdom Podcast (Transcript)

How to Treat Men Better – Alison Armstrong on Modern Wisdom Podcast (Transcript)

Here is the full transcript of relationship coach Alison Armstrong’s interview on Modern Wisdom Podcast with host Chris Williamson, November 29, 2025.

Relationship coach and author Alison Armstrong joins Chris Williamson to unpack what men actually want and how women can bring out the best in them instead of accidentally shutting them down. They explore why men value appreciation, feeling needed and admired more than being superficially “pleased,” and how instincts around safety and security shape modern dating conflicts. Alison also reveals the four most charming qualities men look for in women and the simple shifts that can transform tension into genuine partnership.

The Interview Begins

CHRIS WILLIAMSON: You asked why it is I wanted to speak to you and that you were surprised that I would. I can’t believe that you’re surprised that I would want to speak to you. I think the stuff that I’ve learned about you and your work is—I think you’re phenomenal. I think you’re absolutely wonderful.

I think the idea of working collaboratively to help women get more out of men, as in treat men in a way that they want to be treated, that causes them to behave in the best way that they can to serve their partner, to create this alchemy that ever refines and transcends and includes, I think, is wonderful. I think it’s fantastic.

ALISON ARMSTRONG: Thank you. It’s a privilege.

CHRIS WILLIAMSON: What is it that you’re trying to achieve with your work?

ALISON ARMSTRONG: Heaven on Earth. Love. People choosing love again and again and again over everything else. It’s probably the easiest way to describe it.

CHRIS WILLIAMSON: There’s a lot of different routes to heaven on Earth.

ALISON ARMSTRONG: Yes.

CHRIS WILLIAMSON: What’s the one that you’ve chosen?

The Power of Paradigms

ALISON ARMSTRONG: Oh, boy. There’s so many ways to go at this. I would say the one that I’ve chosen has to do with paradigms. Exposing paradigms, revealing paradigms, reverse engineering. How? The way that a paradigm—every paradigm makes certain things easy, simple, obvious. It makes other things impossible.

And if the results that you want are impossible in the paradigm you’re operating in, get a new one, invent a new one, and even trade them out. “Ah, this gives me access. Okay, let’s go there.”

And since I started studying men in February of 1991, when I found out I was bringing out the worst in y’all, which was great news. I don’t know if you’ve seen that in any of the content you’ve watched. This is the best news. Can I swear?

CHRIS WILLIAMSON: You can swear as much as you’d like.

ALISON ARMSTRONG: Oh, good. We have a policy about swearing, and that is that we do.

CHRIS WILLIAMSON: We are pro swearing. We are proudly pro swearing.

ALISON ARMSTRONG: But only because you can’t separate truth from transformation. If you water down the truth, you water down transformation.

CHRIS WILLIAMSON: Oh, and you are molesting the truth by getting in the way by limiting people’s ability to use language.

ALISON ARMSTRONG: Well, you water it down. And I’m all about potency. And so precision and potency, I think like an engineer. So reverse engineering. And then depending on the result you want, there’s such a thing as too potent for a particular result.

CHRIS WILLIAMSON: Yeah. It’s too refined, too condensed.

ALISON ARMSTRONG: Yep.

CHRIS WILLIAMSON: I love the word precision.

ALISON ARMSTRONG: Yeah. Or there’s in some cases, I’ll generalize. I’ll generalize, and I’ll swing the pendulum so people can find themselves. So it’s purposely imprecise, right?

The Art of Vagueness

CHRIS WILLIAMSON: Yeah. The best songs do that as well. The best songs, music, songs. I think there’s a degree of vagueness in lyrics. So for a long time, just because I hadn’t thought about it enough, I assumed there was nothing that could be said in a song that couldn’t be said in a book or a podcast, because I have way more words, I’m way more precise. I can explain, I can revisit, I can loop back. I can come from a different angle.

But there’s tons of stuff that you can say in songs. Regardless of the fact there’s a melody, there’s stuff that you can say. This is a better way to say it. There’s stuff that you can say in poetry that I can’t say on a podcast.

Yeah, you go, “Well, the poem is limited by its pentameters and the syllables and the phrases. And how is that the case?” Well, because the vacuum, the absence of explanation, allows people to inject themselves into the story, and it sucks them in. So the purposeful vagueness resonates.

ALISON ARMSTRONG: Well, that’s why Keys of the Kingdom and The Queen’s Code and the sequel to The Queen’s Code, which will be The King’s Code—that’s why they’re like, there’s sex in those books, but it’s vague. The more explicit you are in a sex scene than people are judging, “Do I want that or no, I don’t want that.”

You just leave it. Just broad brushstrokes, and then everybody finds themselves in there. They fill in their own pictures, and then it can resonate and can get through.

CHRIS WILLIAMSON: Amen. Easy to please.

ALISON ARMSTRONG: How rigorously are you using the word please?

CHRIS WILLIAMSON: However it lends for you.

The Difference Between Pleasing and Pleasure

ALISON ARMSTRONG: Okay, all right, we’ll go in then. So there’s “please” and there’s “pleasure.” And when men talk about pleasing women, they’re talking about causing pleasure. Thank goodness. If that’s how you mean it for women, which I assert is from being the smaller and weaker gender by virtue of the hormones that kick in at 21 days of gestation.

If you’re destined to have ovaries, or sometimes I call them undescended testicles, we’re just always going to be that way. The physical strength is a function of testosterone. And so because of that, and if you think of millennia of survival mostly depended on physical strength versus a physical paradigm.