Skip to content
Home » Why ChatGPT Can’t Write For You: David Savill (Transcript)

Why ChatGPT Can’t Write For You: David Savill (Transcript)

Here is the full transcript of novelist David Savill’s talk titled “Why ChatGPT Can’t Write For You” at TEDxUniversityofSalford 2024 conference.

Listen to the audio version here:

TRANSCRIPT:

I’m a teacher of reading and writing and a novelist, and today I’m going to talk to you about what that means at the dawn of artificial intelligence. I’m going to suggest to you that your ability to thrive as a human depends upon three questions AI will never answer, and it’s about you, your community, your democracy, and your humanity. But first, of course, a story about someone else.

In the late 1950s, in the Brazilian city of Recife, a Portuguese language teacher called Paulo Freire asked the local mayor for his support in rolling out a literacy program to agricultural workers. He showed the mayor how he employed new methods based upon the idea of critical pedagogy to teach writing and reading with great success. Paulo claimed that in just a few months he had taught 300 literate agricultural workers to read and write.

Paulo Freire’s Literacy Program

The mayor was a radical democrat. He supported the teacher’s literacy teaching, and within two years, Freire’s success made him head of a national literacy program with the ambition of teaching reading and writing to the 40 percent of Brazilians then classified as functionally illiterate. Then in 1964, a military junta overthrew the democratically elected government.

Brazil’s military dictatorship ended all free elections and the national literacy program was stopped. Paulo Freire was jailed. Released after 75 days in jail, he fled the country. The military dictatorship had accused him of being a communist, but his real crime was promising to teach 40 percent of Brazilians to read and write.

Literacy and Political Voice

You see, Brazil’s oligarchical power relations depended upon a law that stopped illiterate people from voting. Without reading and writing, they have no political voice. I teach reading and writing at the University of Salford, where I leave a degree we called creative writing multidiscipline. As you would expect, students who come to study here are already literate.

They can decode, comprehend, and spell words. But literacy is not a binary proposition. It’s a scale. The kind of reading and writing we teach empowers students to continue that journey towards the higher ends of the literacy scale, where reading and writing facilitate critical and creative thinking, analysis, and self-reflection.

Purpose as a Teacher

When I think about my own purpose as a teacher, I think of Paulo Freire because my purpose is most clearly defined by the idea of empowering parts of our national and global community to give them a voice, especially the first two university students of Salford, many of whom come from generations of the working class. I believe the future of a fairer society and human fulfillment is in lifelong learning. And for many, the best path is the lifelong journey of literacy, a journey so many of us end when we leave school.

Paulo Freire’s story is just one of the thousands I could use to demonstrate the very real connection between reading, writing, the health of democratic societies, and individual freedoms. If you’d let me tragically reduce the work of historians, linguists, and evolutionary psychologists for one moment, I want to use metaphors to help us perceive how crucial to human civilization, language, literacy, and the media of communication are. Think of language as the source code of civilization, the obscure programming that has enabled us to communicate with each other and which regenerates and evolves as we do.

The Importance of Literacy

Think of reading and writing as software built upon that source code, enabling societies to store information, develop a collective memory, solve new problems, and through self-reflective association and inference, develop new thoughts. Think of media from Stonehenge lifts to paper books and print in the digital age as technology disseminating information and enabling us to read and write in different ways, differences that can accelerate change in the human world and even change the way reading and writing wire our brains.

It’s a horribly reductive metaphor, but think of literacy like this and you understand not only literacy’s vital relationship to human civilization, to the realms of the social and the political, you also understand why humans developing artificial intelligence see the development of large language models as a crucial stepping stone towards the goal of artificial general intelligence, that is, an artificial intelligence capable of performing any task humans can perform.

ALSO READ:  How To Manipulate Emotions: Timon Krause (Transcript)

We’re not there yet, but it is where we’re heading, and if AI wants to do human, it has to be able to do language. In November 2022, the world was exposed to its first freely available, fully usable, large language model, OpenAI’s ChatGPT, and along with over 100 million users to date, literacy teachers around the world like myself logged on. Uh-oh.

The Impact of ChatGPT

It’s fair to say the first reaction of the teaching community was panic, and not without good reason. A few months after the launch of ChatGPT, 477 academic misconduct cases against students accused of generating essays using AI had been opened across 40% of UK universities. Journalists put ChatGPT to the task of passing tests. It could ace SATs. It could even pass a bar exam in law.

Beyond education, in the field of literature, a popular sci-fi magazine had to close its submission round when an estimated 500 out of 700 submissions were made with large language model software. Sudowrite, a user program based upon ChatGPT software, even claims to have helped you write a novel, a non-fiction book, rewriting your first drafts, and generating plots and character for you.

The Purpose of Reading and Writing

As one friend said to me, “What is the point of you now?” It’s okay, he was a friend. I was less worried about the point of me than I was about how well people understood the purpose and effect of reading and writing in the life of the human brain and in the development of civilization.